Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback]

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 06 November 2019 03:14 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A44A7120826 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 19:14:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MFQR-FuBo7im; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 19:14:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3893A12003E; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 19:14:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050095.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id xA63CUKg028205; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 03:14:02 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=cTcERfDZy8p4k1R8I02L571YUaSSHvMDfTMpNYsMS+o=; b=VAR1kps2Y1UbAlKhkBKsi3X7Ti0qFtWa89z7iqBrNk4nPAOrns8UGn49tulODoJk9RSd zaQHDm8PviiwGHKrisVx3eNjx72rY3ODXv+3FUs0Smnh66AC4ZEW9+jVJDUaVJlajROX zH322jdcBWeS8nKwigSFoh0ryr8kZsEuYTJB/kaJO0Gek27rdi/56/OCsPG51Uv65ZOv 9l9qI80yuPl/aJkq7NP8wZP0nwP6LxOyLm3CNHgJiypvIDZBaT92R+ILd0ot8Jh3qQhB a/cBRBW2+BDXV6prh1ROMUTjvQTJz+V5j2c4NSA1si1+QETuhWXOCmhA5Bs3sQanqgKK 8w==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint7 (prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com [96.6.114.121] (may be forged)) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2w1278h4rv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 06 Nov 2019 03:14:02 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xA632ZXr032233; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 22:14:01 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.53]) by prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2w154yt1xv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Nov 2019 22:14:00 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) by usma1ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 22:13:59 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 22:13:59 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Terry Manderson <terry@terrym.net>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: "nomcom-chair-2019@ietf.org" <nomcom-chair-2019@ietf.org>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback]
Thread-Topic: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback]
Thread-Index: AQHVlCwgx2FNRIWjFUeNXgzfbQQDx6d9vbCAgAAMugD//62xgA==
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 03:13:58 +0000
Message-ID: <35EB2608-880A-4BFF-B714-3AEBD6139FA1@akamai.com>
References: <7E267F5B-0921-412F-B1A5-9A3E5096BD8F@mnot.net> <A64F7A37-16D5-40D4-92B0-36B971CE8BA5@terrym.net>
In-Reply-To: <A64F7A37-16D5-40D4-92B0-36B971CE8BA5@terrym.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1f.0.191103
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.33.80]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <E49CFBD3CACBFA49A62E731F48611F55@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-11-05_09:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=635 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1911060030
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,1.0.8 definitions=2019-11-05_09:2019-11-05,2019-11-05 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1011 mlxlogscore=623 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1908290000 definitions=main-1911060032
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/gi8S88TpiGria30NX6RS192rLXk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 03:14:06 -0000

>    Understand that while the IETF has a huge reputation, there are other standards bodies that are doing this better, and faster, and resulting in bigger improvements to technology. 
  
Serious question: please name them, so we can learn from them.