IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost-08

"Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Mon, 08 May 2017 12:15 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA5112944B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 May 2017 05:15:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=ietf@kuehlewind.net header.d=kuehlewind.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8A53WPophWNG for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 May 2017 05:15:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kuehlewind.net (kuehlewind.net [83.169.45.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FA9A127077 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 May 2017 05:15:44 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=kuehlewind.net; b=RKl6njQoSRDn94HGwRDt9x9rkW0Gl7pDYxqaNwCwS8uUoMU6NTc/dnI8mdTjP2qZv8FTcXajbltqWXRYsHcbvqBYlRJ3vWNAE5a34fPVdfSONaER4JxBJP3akFBsobkUzdbg24LUaCXivuXZmlmpk/ZQZ6itwJUKlgnRi3H57LE=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:X-Mailer:X-PPP-Message-ID:X-PPP-Vhost;
Received: (qmail 29726 invoked from network); 8 May 2017 14:15:42 +0200
Received: from p5dec259c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (HELO ?192.168.178.33?) (93.236.37.156) by kuehlewind.net with ESMTPSA (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 8 May 2017 14:15:42 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost-08
From: "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0701MB2459B2173C921635A61CC24695100@HE1PR0701MB2459.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 14:15:40 +0200
Cc: "art@ietf.org" <art@ietf.org>, "alto@ietf.org" <alto@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost.all@ietf.org>, "Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Nozay)" <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-bell-labs.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2A376548-9BB0-4D7B-81C6-1BD951227FEA@kuehlewind.net>
References: <149144445494.22036.11923880719369865745@ietfa.amsl.com> <DB6PR0701MB24543D95D78557DDEACA2D71951E0@DB6PR0701MB2454.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CABkgnnWAn9r4ZGtVq6yLyYcC7w5rDy4dV+98q0K__Nnm2UfRew@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR0701MB2459B2173C921635A61CC24695100@HE1PR0701MB2459.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
X-PPP-Message-ID: <20170508121542.29717.60305@lvps83-169-45-111.dedicated.hosteurope.de>
X-PPP-Vhost: kuehlewind.net
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/gikkHc4rhU3rWvjLaMLYxwdRTdg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 12:15:47 -0000

Hi Martin,

just to double check: do you think this document is ready now and all your comments have been addressed?

Mirja


> Am 27.04.2017 um 13:57 schrieb Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Nozay) <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-bell-labs.com>:
> 
> Hello Martin,
> 
> I just posted an update where the " Requirements Language" text has been moved in a section 1.1.
> As I saw it on a number of other ietf drafts, I also added the sentence 
> "When the words appear in lower case, their natural language meaning is used."
> 
> The update and status are available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost/
> 
> Thanks,
> Sabine
> 
> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: 26 April 2017 08:39
>>> To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Nozay) <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-
>>> bell-labs.com>
>>> Cc: art@ietf.org; alto@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org; draft-ietf-alto-multi-
>>> cost.all@ietf.org
>>> Subject: Re: Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost-08
>>> 
>>> On 26 April 2017 at 03:26, Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Nozay)
>>> <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-bell-labs.com> wrote:
>>>>>> This document doesn't cite RFC 2119, but it uses the keywords.
>>>> [SR     ] RFC 2119 is cited on page 1, section " Requirements Language" and
>>> section "9.1.  Normative References". Should it be referenced elsewhere?
>>> 
>>> The convention is to put those in the body, I missed it in the boilerplate.
>>> 
>>> I skimmed the other changes, and they look fine.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email