RE: Dispute process (Was: Resignation request)

Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org> Wed, 11 March 2020 22:50 UTC

Return-Path: <masinter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB093A09CC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:50:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.747
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.747 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oatmtcM9N9Gw for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x634.google.com (mail-pl1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::634]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9ED413A0990 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x634.google.com with SMTP id d9so1787506plo.11 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-language:thread-index; bh=06UiLX57eoELe6qoNGwxhl5NKxHi6Sozc8Hi6QuGMJ4=; b=SCqgk21zSXgUXmZpXy4at4uVbSFWFypalfxsQw/V4Yj4rmRK1+motj3Lr7E1IqxHYf h2QbUASUA6++jMvdfuGJpsfwwYpCpawC9CwgAVBUubx7h7vg8t96xrQiiVDqJZ5JOkmj l8YUKRHRI+jSJgR04OfjRREWD9pDXX8QHzd9ic5mVjI68NtpyCJ2UmbBA84d6WpzSnWz GI3ikQX1rXfgTO07szXBKODptceu4/ILJ1OnZu1Yk5LRpuv74YgNJSIYzcoCJ2Cn3iKS 8dfSF9A5Gfapa84V2DkR7tSM7fXdm59FQBNWQTjr+aeWAPOtN/oXEFmGmUIh8LcMRlE8 EVAQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject :date:message-id:mime-version:content-language:thread-index; bh=06UiLX57eoELe6qoNGwxhl5NKxHi6Sozc8Hi6QuGMJ4=; b=bz7YsxdWY7IQ/S34Z+PUBhGJ0G+Jl+oIdDRAhA00/8ObaExBzn6CxUD18hzKabJf6C bcXiaFEn2yv1AyaSV6KULbzfy6kf5ELcxjNdhQHzIN6534J5NnHhKlmfoezXFSd1G6r5 bdIAeJ8Z0B+Y/0yInJNF5x9znX9+tC4gxy+RtLga/1DwbyYoVNUovpsMhDRIDmAFzdU9 yY/jEjViZdIxxKZqxRlaTSvt+F0gYNClmc9BaPmyOfR9R5JzG23Fios/Wa988scvU5vP yC9N6byJJbR6LtXnBK9pohHIYS5V7LkjhXzQt55jYmX1jPudUTd1DQTDEmy+unP/NNKH lZYA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ35ePJhTNB8DM5HEivEgAa67OspdzOVY730Wn6PM04tcYjmUKq8 zPueL+2efVL4AR4uUOXMqKhpLERBXVo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: =?utf-8?q?ADFU+vuDlldQUzznhNrhx+OM2wa9QjsWtqn6IiQ2pY9N?= =?utf-8?q?0FLD8L2hQXWc12Phcph7en/UbyH3KshCvw=3D=3D?=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:cf95:: with SMTP id i21mr874875pju.97.1583967008924; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:50:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TVPC (c-67-169-101-78.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [67.169.101.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w12sm8204111pfn.177.2020.03.11.15.50.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:50:08 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Larry Masinter <masinter@gmail.com>
From: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
X-Google-Original-From: "Larry Masinter" <lmm@acm.org>
To: "'Eric Rescorla'" <ekr@rtfm.com>, "'Nico Williams'" <nico@cryptonector.com>
Cc: "'Paul Wouters'" <paul@nohats.ca>, "'IETF'" <ietf@ietf.org>, "'Pete Resnick'" <resnick@episteme.net>
References: <3EF6505C-D442-41A4-A681-26ACF818BB4D@sobco.com> <C7B7787A-48E5-407F-9E81-BDEC2F1B2169@steffann.nl> <6651697D-A892-4CAB-BDC1-E385750294D3@gmail.com> <a708fc17-c799-2767-4a35-033b063456f5@pi.nu> <CA+q+MpU6-36xTzZL_-B-9fG8atfOiOF5-rdxFFVQV9_y8GOd8Q@mail.gmail.com> <20200310154115.GX18021@localhost> <EF46D631-4553-4378-9260-6E23BE94B14E@episteme.net> <20200310184518.GY18021@localhost> <9AB7F383-1220-4D90-BD8F-B672AF473BE9@episteme.net> <alpine.LRH.2.21.2003110930290.31299@bofh.nohats.ca> <20200311214928.GF18021@localhost> <CABcZeBM1LnigpsnXW7kcH19+0aMHWJwmQ=8=To5mr_EJU-QF-g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBM1LnigpsnXW7kcH19+0aMHWJwmQ=8=To5mr_EJU-QF-g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Dispute process (Was: Resignation request)
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:50:07 -0700
Message-ID: <009901d5f7f7$69d335d0$3d79a170$@acm.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_009A_01D5F7BC.BD7484E0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-us
Thread-Index: =?utf-8?q?AQKNRVLw69kzVsgJXUEp3d/RaHpKcgJG/kR3ArRPomAC6INFAAHX?= =?utf-8?q?B3GvAdhkx08CYF7/ZgIQQv+mAoAIk/YCKGtnqgKxBBs+AjfuggCmCK/SMA=3D=3D?=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/glyhvYvb6pevwde4mqhJ895l74A>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:50:18 -0000

Nico wrote

Then take this to the limit.  Suppose we did some number TLS extensions
this way, with several overlapping somewhat, but in ways the authors did
not care to unify.  What would happen?

 

-Ekr wrote:

> Well, we're running this experiment now, and have been ever since late 2018, so I guess we'll find out. So far it does not seem to have been an issue.

 

The “running code” part of “ rough consensus” seems useful in resolving disputes about a working group dropping or disagreeing to some work.

 

--

LarryMasinter.net