Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update-00.txt> (Update to the Selection of Trustees for the IETF Trust) to Best Current Practice

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Mon, 24 September 2018 17:47 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0471130E60 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 10:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.79
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.79 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=eO9BYVdO; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=GfS0RwYI
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id birGa2I413D1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 10:47:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E686130E3F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 10:47:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([197.226.50.45]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w8OHlAgs023917 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 24 Sep 2018 10:47:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1537811242; x=1537897642; bh=0KZFzcykB/KG2Gx9N0EiAOVLcDdqUnWYZTJ/MAweQJM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=eO9BYVdO2P6BNMKc8EyLOzL4eVJ/A8OUScPiqO8aWujZEXMdzdbilv7BHtRtU38WN XbU176JuHllqChaASmQ8kbOEn2TfnM1YQ58hFnAfWKcvy8mIBwoTtYiijf538Q3PwI WjFEUILt2KRQHePN2MlESI2qgIW8UpxOvZdVXjlc=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1537811242; x=1537897642; i=@elandsys.com; bh=0KZFzcykB/KG2Gx9N0EiAOVLcDdqUnWYZTJ/MAweQJM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=GfS0RwYIiXMLSrDf8hQzQVmC8wlj6eRvu1ffDLSnSxiqx9XQ/UZE4e/IRZxjK/RJY bNCP0ge4LF0nv3SSg0Qj8LuWQsnBCsQrepdjYb3MkT/MsEbeHwyKBuDvaGN/wuXAw5 O5IIhw+W4o+mbiHnyl80L7eYM71K6F7EEuJQr9dk=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20180924090802.0b3bb098@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 10:40:50 -0700
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update-00.txt> (Update to the Selection of Trustees for the IETF Trust) to Best Current Practice
In-Reply-To: <153756470188.20283.12048259576780413892.idtracker@ietfa.am sl.com>
References: <153756470188.20283.12048259576780413892.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/gng0gUCBQ8l26MMhI2UbK716fic>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 17:47:27 -0000

Hi Jari, Ted,
At 02:18 PM 21-09-2018, The IESG wrote:
>The IESG has received a request from the IETF Administrative Support Activity
>2 WG (iasa2) to consider the following document: - 'Update to the Selection
>of Trustees for the IETF Trust'
>   <draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update-00.txt> as Best Current Practice
>
>The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
>comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the

It took me some to understand out what this memo updates as the draft 
does not reference the sections of the previous RFCs which are being 
updated.  I suggest clarifying that in the draft.

Shouldn't draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-rationale-00 be a normative reference?

The draft states that IETF rules regarding recalls will be applicable 
for this new selection process.  I gather that the authors of this 
draft are aware that a significant  [1] number of IETF participants 
who participate remotely.  A person within that group is 
systematically disqualified from participating in a recall 
petition.  I unfortunately have to raise an objection to the 
inclusion of the last paragraph in Section 2.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

1. The number of registered remote participants for IETF 102 was 547.