IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)

David Conrad <david.conrad@nominum.com> Thu, 27 March 2003 00:56 UTC

Received: from ran.ietf.org (ran.ietf.org [10.27.6.60]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA25418; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 19:56:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordomo by ran.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 18yLr3-0007yE-00 for ietf-list@ran.ietf.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 20:06:53 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([10.27.2.28] helo=ietf.org) by ran.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18yLVz-0007Z9-00 for ietf@ran.ietf.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 19:45:07 -0500
Received: from shell.nominum.com (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA24872 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 19:29:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nominum.com (shell.nominum.com [128.177.192.160]) by shell.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89754137F09; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 16:32:15 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 16:32:15 -0800
Subject: Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v551)
Cc: Michel Py <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>, The IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
To: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
From: David Conrad <david.conrad@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <382B8D9A-5FE7-11D7-91E0-000393CB0816@qualcomm.com>
Message-Id: <8F54D757-5FEB-11D7-BCE2-000393DB42B2@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.551)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Ted,

What happens when you change providers?

Rgds,
-drc

On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 04:01  PM, Ted Hardie wrote:

> Michel,
> 	I don't think something needs to be provider independent
> to fit this bill.  Getting a slice of the global address space from
> some provider and choosing not route a portion of it (even
> if that portion is 100%) seems to me to create "non-routed
> globally unique space".  Are you concerned that doing so
> has some impact on the routing system that needs to be
> considered?
> 	Money and other annoyances are certainly concerns we
> all face.  In that spirit please understand that keeping site local 
> costs
> different money and creates different annoyances.
> 				regards,
> 						Ted

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email