IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] New proposal/New SOW comment period

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 13 September 2019 16:44 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3462E12010D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BDor-nqX4gRa for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd33.google.com (mail-io1-xd33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E686A120103 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:44:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd33.google.com with SMTP id a1so5812796ioc.6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:44:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=PV+7DHdNhvtBwhEjK/u+3xCzNql+dR5l/NbeqRnVDws=; b=hHktI0IFJN+aCRMOzBsGdvVv6sSYv6mFQJDiW8RdeflwrajpJbOz9TwR1+OBAPW3RT x9kfzM7UHQq870XO0d+Y8QVdSZwfVqgdpSkZR2FYJoOGultzoYsvXKSyaM2sY4s9LiNZ n5eMTrqfrTLGmT0RxPzyR3iH8iLM6DBT3qkWofQjAV27cElmm/QB6LUm9JhD71FJTUh1 AhTSB+Sge8Wwya1c5uhtGTM4/sV6hwQgbJStrwLT1Dca9lqgLrz3okhfGK8hEW7Dq7sf 6NbF8WK8s6FDgNr6MHKd6cryM/H8U3iDIczfhgtp57SxzCw8+VnSnZavxxaAiXfjZ0wi emag==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=PV+7DHdNhvtBwhEjK/u+3xCzNql+dR5l/NbeqRnVDws=; b=GTD+d70n0jvCo6nsvqYCy4vDqw90p5hkcJFaPHwn5c38gIcmAkg32vzdXrZmU9kpzC mlaAhDwuUgJgWXQDZMBZTQCDDoYp1L4p0YOcXBezZGwx3WCiFmW1t3UrGPemXLID5pzG 8kCSRKOjijVbhwP/3zyEZjuf2hNzixQuKX2l6QrzxP40XHrXWrbZYdV48e6pXPc2NQa+ jGZiWDLB4u7wQzedP8YsmNJG/yPERprBXNgyoPHrtUU+NnJ36iYX2idpUgFALhO5SwSW cCvnAyB7i7Qj3HD7vHJcAaViu9loiwzgLIQGlIxnSKz2YMxvWQqkSXqskaBwZeUHM6Dw s22w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXvZPe5rDwrAxiIRLIEl1u+CQ4q0KdUWIFbU5wGeF/CG9TkOjT0 7rbcZ/fZ10IaXHkkXdmgW8O3rg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxe766iIIjgCIlOoROfFPeLH09uahKkJJDy78helqvZEZBF30sUNHCSA7fHO0jHjPFLXiHeGw==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:89cb:: with SMTP id a11mr777868iot.159.1568393043233; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:44:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:380:6937:7e3:49f8:d983:b006:e11? ([2600:380:6937:7e3:49f8:d983:b006:e11]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m5sm1928885ioh.69.2019.09.13.09.44.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:44:02 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] New proposal/New SOW comment period
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 11:44:01 -0500
Message-Id: <A6757275-5977-43C3-9EDD-B01FD550E61E@fugue.com>
References: <E0AA9720-A0BF-486C-AFD6-0675FDF1D0A3@encrypted.net>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org, iab@iab.org, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <E0AA9720-A0BF-486C-AFD6-0675FDF1D0A3@encrypted.net>
To: Sarah Banks <sbanks@encrypted.net>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17A836)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/h22FZxuuQL_YZ9_hauQFJg7CmIs>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 16:44:11 -0000

On Sep 13, 2019, at 11:34, Sarah Banks <sbanks@encrypted.net> wrote:
> You can't beat up the IAB and RSOC for steering the process in some (potential) nefarious way, then effectively do the exact same and ask the community to bless it in the week left of a comment period.

The way I am reading this is that you are saying that changes as a result of comments made during the comment period are not expected to change the outcome. Is that what you intended to communicate?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email