IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08.txt> (Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification) to Internet Standard

otroan@employees.org Fri, 03 February 2017 18:22 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB2661294CD; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 10:22:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=employees.org; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=otroan@employees.org header.d=employees.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PeJRqRuxAN-7; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 10:22:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from esa01.kjsl.com (esa01.kjsl.com [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::87]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A5612967F; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 10:22:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cowbell.employees.org ([198.137.202.74]) by esa01.kjsl.com with ESMTP; 03 Feb 2017 18:22:20 +0000
Received: from cowbell.employees.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cowbell.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C8CD788A; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 10:22:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=employees.org; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; s=selector1; bh=KBp/7CGwcB6V6QWFHcswc lwGyR8=; b=HiZQtqdwM1k9yxCgfO+dgTVUxuXRzDXX2ItpRL7un16ddbIvdqim6 KAU1urjOGmJjQwsOypBkm/HhO9VC3Sbh/7kuKyvAp0UUVFhlaqbPPduNv2Vtzo5h DkViG/JSvt3kvvwtM+ipiBxzdf/jcpoUlHM0boNfligPykCPhU16+E=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=employees.org; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; q=dns; s=selector1; b=ebKeS/yQcqktyc2 KOpH1EcxvAtRM23lUfsB/KqsV7VWnMXaArgqXimuqLT+sMju+SSnXxqZPb8+D7cF qc+EqvtyRay9QpwStfy9pG7MlW8aGtp1RxEPX7JvX8T174JgWs2NupQqC5670ing wde955pDKcy6Gk996Yw2sjUuQBHY=
Received: from h.hanazo.no (96.51-175-103.customer.lyse.net [51.175.103.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: otroan) by cowbell.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF8E5D788D; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 10:22:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by h.hanazo.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9CC383AD28A; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 19:22:17 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_54C0312F-8A01-4C9A-973B-525713281E0E"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08.txt> (Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification) to Internet Standard
From: otroan@employees.org
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <00af01d27e11$fe539500$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 19:22:16 +0100
Message-Id: <60F01869-8B32-46D3-80B1-A140DF1DDA8A@employees.org>
References: <148599296506.18647.12389618334616420462.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <30725d25-9829-bf50-23c6-9e1b757e5cba@si6networks.com> <7ee506c2-4213-9396-186a-2b742c32f93b@gmail.com> <EA7E5B60-F136-47C6-949C-D123FB8DA70E@cisco.com> <00af01d27e11$fe539500$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
To: "tom p." <daedulus@btconnect.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/h44m6cnUYRM4ArCEmoZAdH_GxcQ>
Cc: 6man-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis@tools.ietf.org, "Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 18:22:23 -0000

> are we re-spinning the debate on a WG-agreed text ?
> 
> <tp>
> 
> Yes, and I am sure that that is exactly what is intended.

Then let's encourage people outside of 6man, with other points of view, and other arguments to come forward.

A re-run of the discussions already had in 6man with the same arguments and the same participants doesn't seem useful.

For a brief (sic) overview take a look at 672 messages already on the topic:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?q=header+insertion&f_list=ipv6

O.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email