Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 01 April 2017 18:16 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A96B12964B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 11:16:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.275
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.275 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_GREY=0.424] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IXeB2Dm-EFPT for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 11:16:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x235.google.com (mail-yw0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CB6A129512 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 11:16:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x235.google.com with SMTP id i203so50121655ywc.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 11:16:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=sVXpAcM6AFtcchlk59pRAW+0TiI66xkdnanzgPT6exk=; b=Bz2iIeqAItZK1mndW1YUI07xV3GxpR4POeO+36tr6RBInCCMFhqTrK0QJB0KC9zvFd 59wuLd730YNycdPzX7GpOmgdAfMzi2zv6WYMYhWJnjtaNbxdgHNgA1Nzk/e/CxWoQBl6 IE4G/wxsj7oxVfm1u2x2Ti54IXYlZeXDzmCtIb2rehkI6uNzLZfoVD87QulGrfnuKE93 eQUC8MiYqiK2g2AIMvoztLnYM67QH8X+lY5fm+Cx0VIdQXnvjiEysbuzkrqS2vqcRu2D sp66aL3gJ1/rTupD4EK45hloDhvEBvI/kfJ77IdtRVSe65ON3pzvEC9xn8WCK3HfYhJh gzOA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=sVXpAcM6AFtcchlk59pRAW+0TiI66xkdnanzgPT6exk=; b=UxnAmC6gAdrr+QOAVnfxBIQBAXdIAN2OQ7iGJwasP1W2shOfzYY8H0V9iPcVeA+bk0 oGK6Cze6P+zrD/02iU0Ic5h3OGxF09bjcdRroEofrstg1mTRMAVufF+WQ8RgrML83YNN B1SHlrsQ9m5LcFvm0h+gQYISnwSbbxyXzynHYezfvBkHMq3C0DGubZj+csu7jMgQkWh0 c8ByaIkj6LgfH/KTlAIgwkK5tkXNC286iPG6idxVmFtR9rrS+Hl3BXNKbl+orbN+89RL oFlHvJS9i9Y2BrDahX6hfwRvX9dYrf7ymoFSVmmFDxcObtP5gLXKSxjKW5w6OYUwbN2P 2CWw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1Rz/CoH6LVzgXfHVCwrLp1Bkf3PsW2XsYNdpJLCyz9S+hAkOz8ti63yKv8IALt42gAap8hv7n3jS0MCA==
X-Received: by 10.129.196.67 with SMTP id s3mr6668503ywj.248.1491070594437; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 11:16:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.73.129 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 11:16:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.37.73.129 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 11:16:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <eb1bb52f-490f-a04d-64cc-a7522cd4835c@gmail.com>
References: <149096990336.4276.3480662759931758139.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9fee9874-1306-07a2-a84a-4e09381a5336@cisco.com> <eb1bb52f-490f-a04d-64cc-a7522cd4835c@gmail.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2017 13:16:33 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-ef3bHKTM4GvvWk5bo972Es+Y4vRyvwoPdpZtmKTgoshw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities
To: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c1a85f61dd898054c1eedbf
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/h4kYeB8agkXoovJPKtVCg44ab8E>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 18:16:37 -0000

If you haven't seen it, there's also a surveymonkey link about border
crossing experiences at IETF 98 that is also appropriate for people who
stayed home because of concerns and for US attendees who didn't cross
borders, and the last question on the questionnaire is roughly "do you have
concerns about future US meetings".

I sent my comments there.

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/WMNH9PS

I assume the survey entries will become publicly available at some point -
attendee surveys usually do.

Thanks,

Spencer

On Mar 31, 2017 18:58, "Stewart Bryant" <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 31/03/2017 15:42, Eliot Lear wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On 3/31/17 9:18 AM, IAOC Chair wrote:
>>
>>> The IAOC remains committed to soliciting input on future IETF meeting
>>> locations. With this mail, we are soliciting input on some potential IETF
>>> locations, including one where we have met before, but for which conditions
>>> may have changed.
>>>
>>> Specifically, we seek community input on reasons we could not have a
>>> successful meeting in any of the following cities, or of any limits to
>>> attendee accessibility or inclusiveness that should be considered:
>>>
>>> Ottawa
>>> San Francisco
>>> Austin, TX
>>> Barcelona
>>> Boston
>>> Busan - looks expensive to get to
>>> Calgary - also looks expensive to get to
>>> Denver
>>> Helsinki
>>> Houston
>>> New Orleans
>>> Osaka
>>> Philadelphia
>>> Washington DC
>>>
>>
>> To save everyone doing it, it would be good to show representative
> airfares and times from a major hub in Europe, East and West Coast, and Asia
>
> I am sure cost and travel time will impact acceptability.
>
> - Stewart
>
>