Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities

[Spencer Dawkins at IETF <[e-mail]>]

If you haven't seen it, there's also a surveymonkey link about border
crossing experiences at IETF 98 that is also appropriate for people who
stayed home because of concerns and for US attendees who didn't cross
borders, and the last question on the questionnaire is roughly "do you have
concerns about future US meetings".

I sent my comments there.

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/WMNH9PS

I assume the survey entries will become publicly available at some point -
attendee surveys usually do.

Thanks,

Spencer

On Mar 31, 2017 18:58, "Stewart Bryant" <[e-mail]> wrote:

>
>
> On 31/03/2017 15:42, Eliot Lear wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On 3/31/17 9:18 AM, IAOC Chair wrote:
>>
>>> The IAOC remains committed to soliciting input on future IETF meeting
>>> locations. With this mail, we are soliciting input on some potential IETF
>>> locations, including one where we have met before, but for which conditions
>>> may have changed.
>>>
>>> Specifically, we seek community input on reasons we could not have a
>>> successful meeting in any of the following cities, or of any limits to
>>> attendee accessibility or inclusiveness that should be considered:
>>>
>>> Ottawa
>>> San Francisco
>>> Austin, TX
>>> Barcelona
>>> Boston
>>> Busan - looks expensive to get to
>>> Calgary - also looks expensive to get to
>>> Denver
>>> Helsinki
>>> Houston
>>> New Orleans
>>> Osaka
>>> Philadelphia
>>> Washington DC
>>>
>>
>> To save everyone doing it, it would be good to show representative
> airfares and times from a major hub in Europe, East and West Coast, and Asia
>
> I am sure cost and travel time will impact acceptability.
>
> - Stewart
>
>