IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorate reviews]

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Thu, 07 November 2019 21:17 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D066112099B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 13:17:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DJnfok1-ceTn for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 13:17:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2A2C120104 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 13:17:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F2020C55; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 16:17:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 07 Nov 2019 16:17:14 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=nHoeyId5UBfxxZuR17zWf1y5UjBKfGnzXzGSYKQHT Ck=; b=i22eztsgPscuZUjh6CJ34geyP82NuBGUzxmpVIpnFsxKk0UdT77LTyC6q r7hN4/wfQDc1HOs/ryXT2dfYm/5Kzi+zrp+qww+LTedog5MPF004tGNJvNS4Rt6B WJB5Qj7Tj30K5g5oBAZD/asRtHq+ID1cBUB+xrTRNKBHwQlp10zP62r9+OeMjzos xllBN4iKJ+AbCtGofoazbho3/TyXFkgNKP/JIbmoGMLmjT1uM2G2JZGsLbROy6J8 6GzG2FfbFxg/IslnhehySqpgetmyXbspk7ZQJjqvgau8n0vOJ0AWCJkK9mdy3gMQ Fa4WOpOTOoErbZTKyBbNY/pshtr7A==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:2YnEXacuzrQVCe3G57EYmSqeuqetlYO5sxjsM_LhxVDaJLYIk7Pkjg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrudduledgudegjecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtgfesth ejredttdefjeenucfhrhhomhepmfgvihhthhcuofhoohhrvgcuoehmohhorhgvsehnvght fihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomheqnecukfhppedutdekrddvvddurddukedtrd duheenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgv rhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:2YnEXfHwensKUcLLciApcKUX7UOMhqO353dkYxzifIUuONmG52nRhA> <xmx:2YnEXTXdK4dGKwVCG__r6kQRKEYfDrEThatBvIgZosGZK2oUnsHmjg> <xmx:2YnEXWLbMEcdTO40KnCnQlTHZf_cY7MaLQya3XVncAGt1A8VNinjHw> <xmx:2onEXdPDBK1Ty-fr19E6zpFD07ngAgGOZ5rRMqQtpJZdW_EsH9Fl7Q>
Received: from [192.168.1.97] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 234BD306005C; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 16:17:12 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorate reviews]
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <20191107014849.GC12148@localhost> <563174A8-3961-476C-889D-A712EFD5DAEA@mnt.se> <20191107193314.GE12148@localhost>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <10988aa0-afe6-4e5f-ad9d-6952cc4730a8@network-heretics.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 16:17:12 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20191107193314.GE12148@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/h5pBQR9tMTW99btzuQZSz-7lu3E>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 21:17:16 -0000

On 11/7/19 2:33 PM, Nico Williams wrote:

> Can we run an experiment where for some WG(s) we
> don't require IESG review of their PS documents?

Why in the world would we want to do that?

Keith

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email