Re: Meeting "lounges" at IETF meetings

Michael Richardson {quigon} <mcr@sandelman.ca> Fri, 03 August 2012 18:49 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C56E21F8E23 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 11:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7GEIm8oHUODs for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 11:49:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D4CE21F8E2B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 11:49:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPV6:2001:df8:0:16:5487:487d:3852:4fce] (unknown [IPv6:2001:df8:0:16:5487:487d:3852:4fce]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F0422016C; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 15:02:09 -0400 (EDT)
References: <D7F9B7BE-0ED6-4B8C-808C-C75FA1A6800B@vpnc.org>
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <D7F9B7BE-0ED6-4B8C-808C-C75FA1A6800B@vpnc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----2TFF49ST8CR2X26PTLWF7DPQDGRMXM"
Subject: Re: Meeting "lounges" at IETF meetings
From: Michael Richardson {quigon} <mcr@sandelman.ca>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 11:49:35 -0700
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, ietf list <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <342151eb-28c7-43ae-b4dc-f9bd69be37cd@email.android.com>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 04 Aug 2012 17:44:50 -0700
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 18:49:49 -0000

I agree with having the terminal room... let's get some signs on the stairs to the fourth floor when we return.
When we return fall 2013, can we move all the break food into the space at the top of the escalator, away from the doors in/out of Regency.
Let's also get a few more couches around the place... the Quebec 2011 big room was awesome, in hindsight.

-- 
Sent from my Android tablet.

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:

Greetings again. Some meeting venues have had insufficient places where five or so people could comfortably gather for informal meetings, while other venues did this just fine. One proposal has been that the Secretariat reserve large rooms for this. Unfortunately, that adds significant cost to the meetings.

Instead, I propose that we simply designate the terminal room (which is already reserved for future meetings) be designated as meeting areas where talking is allowed / encouraged. Earplugs could be provided for people who really want a quiet Ethernet connection; the cost of those for the Secretariat will be about $25/meeting.

--Paul Hoffman