Re: London is Venue for IETF 101

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Fri, 18 November 2016 04:34 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E91612953C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 20:34:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JBu8a-w-pZWt for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 20:34:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x241.google.com (mail-pg0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 883141293FC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 20:34:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x241.google.com with SMTP id p66so19453564pga.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 20:34:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:subject:to:references:cc:reply-to:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uIACUsE/QTYStDwfSUwSpdckIrTGGsA7HoIZ+He2mwQ=; b=GrfkXfshCeotM2yIlONJ7k69wH+hBH1vefBmkMGKr90EZGj/W8BM6pZaG1+N5NSlAS XwwmLyL+JfAFqXNDtGHP8rQQsbCqxFJMcXX2XgwWsxmuTJ2Ctdk2zII1UJmjySLzNXiV MZD6FNbV95kvj4GL1Lcjh/it5ILYYfF3vwwO5wnQKAHxLpidoVZ2V87OY+K9xUtD4cxn ezrmTUyxYUvcXR8K0wq370I0k/FS75C8Hz3IXUo+T4oRuJbrbHm4lEQyfFLSJLKbtXCF WgR86XXPoY729hCbuW0zVPmRoDsUj7q7dx6l2ZvwiawZ8FUKszobczeO0mZhx/kZPzWo S7PA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:references:cc:reply-to :organization:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uIACUsE/QTYStDwfSUwSpdckIrTGGsA7HoIZ+He2mwQ=; b=DJbfjzcB76+FZ7wwFmC9pim+qNhbA/EKnlpJi/lOFTQO69FL+e/hHR+gSQiuS6l+FD oTmuOYT6kol5V2Ja2lCn7uMg88tgFCUvZPy9clXlgYqeuwJ8qGfaHq5FvmgJVRk4bfk3 KdPzj42g7qW569w/CoLJVrXzoAha5aWO94BKL6fxKJwM2E2zINz4uchi6afYNpRJ05R6 FE9aSpjj4ZbOvhPKEk8pCYZC5cguZlF3O8TzNeTxGQi9mHm5JvDmuadQQh9CkGdq119T vHm0/khxHWyWnDSW/u5Prw6NOEf59rLCLhlEIp/Bhvl5SBo90aqO9AZ+oL514T4ikyYd x/zw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfGJROIYgIQ2vCSU2ZxR8IVyDK09KpuATpOrTWPxbH9H6YpnJ+6sCsjS7s22Gi0Qg==
X-Received: by 10.99.48.68 with SMTP id w65mr14979052pgw.68.1479443643894; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 20:34:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.31.98.213] ([116.84.121.251]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k67sm12337979pfk.69.2016.11.17.20.34.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 17 Nov 2016 20:34:03 -0800 (PST)
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Subject: Re: London is Venue for IETF 101
To: kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com
References: <147921551688.10352.13456202900704034105.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <757.1479273286@dooku.sandelman.ca> <CAMm+LwhouWLgJwZ1XHp9cX3azyhx_TqYEm-JE8kMg5aUkWb_sw@mail.gmail.com> <268D20B2-3F02-4AC2-8BFA-342B5321449F@gmail.com>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <0ac80bca-100e-1df5-05a7-9e4e7ee68f5e@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 13:34:01 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <268D20B2-3F02-4AC2-8BFA-342B5321449F@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/h9h4PvIMgUPQBWYD9p0EvKYPrQ4>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 04:34:06 -0000

On 11/18/2016 9:18 AM, kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com wrote:
> Something we may want to consider for future venue selection:


Kathleen,

So, we're in the middle of doing the 'meeting venue selection' document 
and I'm finding myself reacting to your note with a "yes, but...".

Yes, we may.

But I don't know what that means, in concrete, reliable, practical terms 
that gives the IAOC guidance that will reflect community concerns ahead 
of time.

Any suggestions?

d/


-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net