Re: Appointment of a Transport Area Director

Samuel Weiler <weiler@watson.org> Thu, 07 March 2013 20:49 UTC

Return-Path: <weiler@watson.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55BA21F8461 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 12:49:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ps-es9uNBpYp for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 12:49:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FB0521F8A9B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 12:49:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r27Kn257010744; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 15:49:02 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from weiler@watson.org)
Received: from localhost (weiler@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id r27Kn1jq010741; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 15:49:02 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from weiler@watson.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: fledge.watson.org: weiler owned process doing -bs
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 15:49:01 -0500
From: Samuel Weiler <weiler@watson.org>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Subject: Re: Appointment of a Transport Area Director
In-Reply-To: <5138F22D.5040206@dcrocker.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1303071532160.50049@fledge.watson.org>
References: <5134F720.5010507@cisco.com> <tsl1ubvlywt.fsf@mit.edu> <CAHBDyN6AM-_b2HMrmmQQVuhxFc-_Rfpfg0=r38mkcJ4zqoJeTw@mail.gmail.com> <tslr4julxmh.fsf@mit.edu> <1C1C0842-BF6A-4A3F-A312-35CF0A994793@lilacglade.org> <BDCCFB12-1F2C-44BD-867A-92E5745F3D39@vigilsec.com> <7B6FDB89-F360-45B6-8240-F2F9F81ABAA7@vigilsec.com> <9292FB65-9842-4C95-9284-15F1E9ECEE1D@lilacglade.org> <5138AE1F.5080602@neclab.eu> <tsl6213p67w.fsf@mit.edu> <20130307182406.GR2854@nsn.com> <tslk3pjm55w.fsf@mit.edu> <5138F22D.5040206@dcrocker.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (fledge.watson.org [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 07 Mar 2013 15:49:02 -0500 (EST)
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 20:49:09 -0000

On Thu, 7 Mar 2013, Dave Crocker wrote:

> The IESG defines the job requirements.  The Nomcom selects according to those 
> criteria.
>
> I'm been in a number of Nomcom's that wished for some flexibility concerning 
> job requirements, but each of these Nomcoms was very clear that it did not 
> have a mandate to make changes in job criteria.
>
> That is, the Nomcoms each viewed themselves as executing IESG policy, rather 
> than formulating policy.

I have not been on a NomCom with Dave Crocker.  When I was on Nomcom 
(without Dave), I recall explicitly questioning some of the IESG's 
stated job requirements.

In general, I think it is entirely appropriate for NomComs to 
second-guess the IESG's job requirements, and some nomcoms (or at 
least some nomcom members) have done so.

-- Sam