Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections
John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Sat, 23 January 2021 04:43 UTC
Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FDC43A0BF2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 20:43:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KA-HOStbN6xK for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 20:43:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BE4D3A0BDB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 20:43:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1l3Am5-000I3f-Pc; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 23:43:49 -0500
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 23:43:44 -0500
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>
cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections
Message-ID: <BA07FAFAE7BBE5C47BCB7F58@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <437bfe25-185c-4637-ae9a-59a6ccaade99@dogfood.fastmail.com>
References: <289B641E-F445-407F-9A7D-FCDEA9698F7C@akamai.com> <437bfe25-185c-4637-ae9a-59a6ccaade99@dogfood.fastmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/hDFAOIWDu__fSXmOVhaJbyKjdSg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 04:43:54 -0000
--On Saturday, January 23, 2021 13:29 +1100 Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021, at 05:20, Salz, Rich wrote: >> Congratulations to those picked for the incoming leadership >> positions. Of the people whom I know, they are all >> intelligent people, with good technical knowledge, but seem >> always open to discussion and changing their mind. I am sure >> those that I don't know are similar. I can't find fault >> with any of these choices. > >> > >> And yet … > >> > >> When looked at collectively, I am very disappointed. The >> number of women in leadership has not changed. On the IESG, >> every incumbent was re-selected, except for one who moved >> over from IESG to the IAB. On the IAB, three of five >> incumbents were picked. The IETF Trust and LLC Board members >> were similarly re-appointed incumbents. Nobody was added who >> is not employed by a large Internet or service provider >> company, except for one re-appointed incumbent who works at a >> "think tank" with deep historical ties to the IETF. > > > Hi Rich, > > You make some very interesting points here. I'm interested in > whether you think the issue is with the pool of available > candidates who put their hands up for roles, or with the > selection process not valuing diversity sufficiently. > > And of course there is a related question here - regardless of > which you think the root cause - because we are an > organisation composed of those who show up. That question is: > > of the available candidates, if you had the choice, who would > you have selected instead of those who were chosen? i.e. what > would your "perfect" slate have been, given the candidates > that were available. Bron, Since Rich was one of the candidates, asking him that question may be a bit unfair. More generally, I think the community might be better off if we avoided second-guessing the Nomcom decisions in terms of specific people and stuck instead with the concerns that Rich described and Jason's response. For example and rather than going on at length, I suggest that my views on returning or replacing incumbents have not changed much since Spencer and I produced https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-klensin-nomcom-term/ in 2006 and https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-klensin-nomcom-incumbents-first/ three years later. Whether the specific ideas in those documents are right or not, especially this many years later, they at least contain more of an analysis of the issues than assuming that incumbents were returned because they did a great job. FWIW, I am also doubtful that returning many incumbents can be interpreted as "everything is just great" (a more extreme version of what Jason said) or anything close to it. Nomcoms are faced with a large selection of complicated considerations and tradeoffs. I have every reason to believe that this one did a careful, through, and contentious job (regardless of what any of us may think of the results) and assuming we can deduce the basis on which they made their decisions seems inappropriate and at least a tad disrespectful. I do worry about another issue, one that Rich did not mention. I remember Barbara posting a note strongly encouraging people to put their names in even if there were incumbents willing to serve an additional term. Because putting one's name in requires considerable effort, if the impression in the community is that incumbents will almost always be returned, it is going to be harder and harder to find anyone to volunteer for their slots (I note that one incumbent this time ran unopposed). But that concern isn't new either; Spencer and I addressed it and a possible solution in the second I-D mentioned above. best, john
- NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections NomCom Chair 2020
- RE: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Job Snijders
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Salz, Rich
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Livingood, Jason
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Bron Gondwana
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections John C Klensin
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Bron Gondwana
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Loa Andersson
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Brian Carpenter
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections John C Klensin
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Bron Gondwana
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections tom petch
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Salz, Rich
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Salz, Rich
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections John C Klensin
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Michael Richardson
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Brian E Carpenter
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Joel M. Halpern
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Keith Moore
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections John C Klensin
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections John C Klensin
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Donald Eastlake
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Salz, Rich
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Salz, Rich
- RE: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections STARK, BARBARA H
- RE: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections John C Klensin
- RE: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Adrian Farrel
- RE: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections John C Klensin
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Donald Eastlake
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Livingood, Jason
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections John C Klensin
- RE: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections STARK, BARBARA H
- Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 Annou… Michael StJohns
- Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 A… Salz, Rich
- Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 A… Keith Moore
- Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 A… Michael StJohns
- Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 A… Michael StJohns
- Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 A… Michael Richardson
- Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 A… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 A… Keith Moore
- Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 A… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 A… Michael StJohns
- Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 A… Salz, Rich
- Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 A… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 A… Salz, Rich
- Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 A… Michael StJohns
- Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 A… Keith Moore
- Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 A… Salz, Rich
- Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 A… Keith Moore
- Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 A… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 A… Keith Moore
- Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 A… Fernando Gont
- Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 A… Fernando Gont
- Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 A… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 A… Jay Daley
- Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 A… Michael StJohns
- Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 A… Michael StJohns
- Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 A… Keith Moore
- Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 A… Fernando Gont
- Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 A… Fernando Gont
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Salz, Rich
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Fernando Gont
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Fernando Gont
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Salz, Rich
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Fernando Gont
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Salz, Rich
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Fernando Gont
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Terry Manderson
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Fernando Gont
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Keith Moore
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Eliot Lear
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Keith Moore
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Eliot Lear
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections tom petch
- RE: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Maisonneuve, Julien (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Fernando Gont
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 A… S Moonesamy
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Keith Moore
- RE: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections S Moonesamy
- Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections Spencer Dawkins at IETF