Re: The ecosystem is moving

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Fri, 13 May 2016 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F362C12D662 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 May 2016 10:57:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F1IXpGkf2HVW for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 May 2016 10:57:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22e.google.com (mail-pf0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65E8112D613 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 May 2016 10:57:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 206so44946713pfu.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 May 2016 10:57:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:reply-to:subject:references:to:cc:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xU8tbQCHQyci7jBHmtadJ9Tpyro5hm8m/oQFj4smf10=; b=fEjftlj36XyigliuaKrwpSs76ahQl2Nj12W22NethG1jEylYsqKfaF7tBLlABqjcAa 7K4IuzQi+ErE9NXMUij+CpcNbK+RNXE/uyHjzA5Dg18qobZysoDimQu6i3KIwGBbGpOC HL0XrHD/4XFC7pG+8Hhap+EQ//2FLNoQZNUxcA9oNYWL7tc1kAtqNHcQPPv6bjoPzU8j wNcO3s12Npjv8uj0BsnH13+J8Ujm3IPbtn+z9yToHiPcVwUApy/ZPXrMA1NdnxGuTYqZ u/URHCGQGlxgqWYqtoXNoCrLsSVciovXXWM4d7m9PPJo6q/ewCHyDSDaMzp85TRoP5yb whsQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:reply-to:subject:references:to:cc :organization:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xU8tbQCHQyci7jBHmtadJ9Tpyro5hm8m/oQFj4smf10=; b=adKuOCuza/hRC00Z0Dh/dr4Wcw1GkpUkn7Ng5iLCmGA5cUVAsKTEi1jFbxLFNzRAfy sVfLTBa44SoNXhcf0yooFdx/BZ3RZlMn5fVlQ/NIZuT1Q8+4+4mQzfd4+eSrMvifQBML 4af4MzEjFyqgvekBaXgtC7ASzzmsZBVEGV5fosrjEo1RcQNyRfCCARLZao6lAuvBqKiJ mzGxUONb+Oyyw2VmcawbpSS1Qskrbx4Skc4Om7D5LZqNN2p1XMfry/+L6u4aQo2AkRYQ P1BK5sTFZ39BmXHaWpfvq/EtWgXUTShEydzNrZN9is0yhdL6BoXpuuQCXcrkDP9oYAs3 HyxQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVsfPR+9V0naDR1fZltRYofSFD2TFc8nvBy0B+n0Vx9nNt5IHBKmGyv65Nw8T5JgQ==
X-Received: by 10.98.29.137 with SMTP id d131mr25327774pfd.2.1463162224893; Fri, 13 May 2016 10:57:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.27.241] ([4.53.140.129]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l88sm28906425pfi.55.2016.05.13.10.57.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 13 May 2016 10:57:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Subject: Re: The ecosystem is moving
References: <20160513165714.035DB1A4B7@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp> <alpine.LRH.2.20.1605131301300.10810@bofh.nohats.ca> <CAPt1N1=DOL7ysKb0pspZz+EbyVaVn=KCSeqQ=MBBU0vCXDcPpw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <57361558.2010700@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 10:56:40 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1=DOL7ysKb0pspZz+EbyVaVn=KCSeqQ=MBBU0vCXDcPpw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/hDnvubhPZZbnULnG45cjvpuaj4s>
Cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>, "ietf@ietf.org Discussion" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 17:57:07 -0000

On 5/13/2016 10:32 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> I have to agree with Martin's general conclusions here: using XMPP is
> really hard, both as an end-user and as a provider.   I am able to get
> it working about one out of every three IETFs.  The sticky wicket tends
> to be finding a place that will both host my XMPP account _and_
> interoperate with the IETF's XMPP server.
>
> Why doesn't the IETF just operate an XMPP server on which IETF
> participants can get accounts?   Layer 9, or is it just really hard?


Yes, but...

The IETF is supposed to be about interoperability.  If XMPP has on-going 
utility problems with interoperability, the IETF should look for ways to 
fix them.

To date, we really only have two services that demonstrate open (ie, 
multi-administration) interoperability at Internet scale:  email and DNS.

After this many years, that's sad.


d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net