Re: Hotel situation

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Wed, 16 December 2015 18:12 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D70051A8032 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:12:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cqfnoyGDxEPZ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:12:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x231.google.com (mail-lf0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 758291A8702 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:12:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id p203so35629396lfa.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:12:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=HEaHNhHkqQyVe4CgNDsKSffUVT/gm4tym2FA5q87XeA=; b=xtNJRCzsTm++bI3ITeeUEE79770q7/aFF6nNt/ai8M1AyQRuqBHxokwazhPRDsdMFe WW1bXDb156XW+Kh1R4zx7dbK+nLVwYCAZximi7SHFBQUqGAl4/FZ84/cSbH8/pYTbsAH qKSF2Fhu2HEH8MQgj6qYPmangCQXnRf8NseCqTsaj1107M1gpfZO1FTAe2w6ZvVJw36R uRe/PnL0wOT0z2KkiYl/mm/q9rmjpBEY9i6++XXEMVG1hg95Xo6Q1ApSo/4BxORvoo/b 1VyFVcyBmpxyxygI/MaICfziaLELArS/YwMiOeRQi5tSvoseuyd3lLN1bLwiOyZiZu/T oUyw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.25.208.206 with SMTP id h197mr19530445lfg.153.1450289535258; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:12:15 -0800 (PST)
Sender: hallam@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.1.227 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:12:15 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <56719B42.2040902@gmail.com>
References: <567192F3.9090506@gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630797A09BC1@mbx-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM> <56719864.8010604@gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630797A09C09@mbx-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM> <56719B42.2040902@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:12:15 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: cgww1Ubc5L0-FXNDMbNRhcgLDVI
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwg4_E193M9KXZ3LbmDgyxW5rbn9dNcj5PARE6i2DpH3NA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Hotel situation
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/hJLXmhltJb8ROt8FXTL_2ONILbk>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 18:12:19 -0000

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/16/15 8:05 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
>> This is an excellent point, and reinforces my belief that you'd be a
>> good IAOC candidate.
>
> I have no interest in being a professional IETFer but I
> have considerable interest in having meetings be effective
> (I'd like to see them deprioritized, but as long as there
> are working group chairs who treat them as the locus of
> working group activity that's not going to happen).  There
> are productivity costs associated with being at an
> overflow hotel - working breakfast meetings become more
> difficult and impromptu conversations become constrained
> to the hours someone is in the building.
>
> I don't know what Usenix is doing these days but back
> when I was heavily involved we always seemed to find
> hotels that could accommodate most attendees.  But, they
> had a very, very skilled professional meeting organizer
> on staff rather than relying on a committee of volunteers.

Looking at their list of past meetings, the vast majority are in the
US. The ones outside the US are almost all regional conferences or the
annual storage conference in Haifa.