Re: i18n requirements (was: Re: NF* (Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call))

Jan Pechanec <jan.pechanec@oracle.com> Sun, 04 January 2015 02:42 UTC

Return-Path: <jan.pechanec@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B031A1ADF; Sat, 3 Jan 2015 18:42:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P_bTOMERiPqQ; Sat, 3 Jan 2015 18:42:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0BE91A1AD8; Sat, 3 Jan 2015 18:42:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ucsinet22.oracle.com (ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id t042gW55003971 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 4 Jan 2015 02:42:33 GMT
Received: from userz7021.oracle.com (userz7021.oracle.com [156.151.31.85]) by ucsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.5+Sun/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t042gRX4028357 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 4 Jan 2015 02:42:28 GMT
Received: from abhmp0001.oracle.com (abhmp0001.oracle.com [141.146.116.7]) by userz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t042gRf5012875; Sun, 4 Jan 2015 02:42:27 GMT
Received: from keflavik.us.oracle.com (/10.132.148.214) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sat, 03 Jan 2015 18:42:27 -0800
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 18:42:25 -0800 (PST)
From: Jan Pechanec <jan.pechanec@oracle.com>
X-X-Sender: jpechane@keflavik
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Subject: Re: i18n requirements (was: Re: NF* (Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call))
In-Reply-To: <20141231194426.GP24442@localhost>
Message-ID: <alpine.GSO.2.00.1501031829380.6923@keflavik>
References: <CAK3OfOgm_ZYj-rY+4ExZzY8KY4G3rz2KLrZ8hQJi7ZUR4yiP0Q@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.GSO.2.00.1412300946340.4549@keflavik> <CAK3OfOha9qu=uDtqwDTdV78waLMaorYq0T6cq1YX3VzQn2OpKA@mail.gmail.com> <A4CC6CEC-D17E-4235-B615-9D2AD88096D4@frobbit.se> <20141231070328.GK24442@localhost> <B08B813F-B8B4-49F1-A0B9-60F322C8E9C7@frobbit.se> <20141231074641.GM24442@localhost> <947CA101-D717-4B56-8EEE-84B3A53BF4A1@frobbit.se> <20141231082551.GN24442@localhost> <E4837FDB76D5ACDEB1C568DF@[192.168.1.128]> <20141231194426.GP24442@localhost>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (GSO 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Source-IP: ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/hPitvLZi0JW7tWTazPCRg7VLpsc
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, Darren J Moffat <Darren.Moffat@oracle.com>, ietf@ietf.org, saag@ietf.org, =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Patrik_F=E4ltstr=F6m?= <paf@frobbit.se>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 02:42:42 -0000

On Wed, 31 Dec 2014, Nico Williams wrote:

>> Alternate suggestion in the interest of getting this out and
>> recognizing that this is mostly a PKCS#11 problem (presumably
>> ITU and/or RSA, but what do I know) and shouldn't be an IETF one:
>
>RSA.

	for the record, PKCS#11 management has been transitioned to 
OASIS in 2013.  There is a recent draft out for version 2.40 and 
supposedly it should become a new version of the standard soon.  2.30 
draft from 2009 never made it so the last version is still 2.20 from 
2004.

	I do not see anything about UTF-8 normalization and/or i18n in 
2.40.  I will reach out to them and ask whether that was a deliberate 
decision.  However, I think we can proceed with the URI draft 
independently to that if it is updated as discussed here.

	I'm just going through this whole thread.

	regards, Jan.

-- 
Jan Pechanec <jan.pechanec@oracle.com>