Re: [Offlist] IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Fri, 31 July 2020 08:51 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7813A10F8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 01:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.989
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.989 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL=0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L3=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GkOHgDYBaoyU for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 01:51:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 16EF03A10F9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 01:50:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 87791 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2020 08:33:09 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 31 Jul 2020 08:33:09 -0000
Subject: Re: [Offlist] IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <159552214576.23902.6025318815034036362@ietfa.amsl.com> <D208C070-48ED-4878-AB2E-4671C2AC649A@gmail.com> <2c018854-bfc1-e014-6e5d-2ed799a6a602@gmail.com> <20200724081624.GA23120@nic.fr> <3C33CD3E-7765-4E79-854C-A035EF5CDAC5@dukhovni.org> <4B5F1FA5-710B-4DC5-892D-66067EC254D9@gmail.com> <6532836a574145f3bc3c6203443ad5cf@att.com>
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Message-ID: <75edf916-beaf-5e99-f842-971518b6bd19@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 17:50:59 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6532836a574145f3bc3c6203443ad5cf@att.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/hVkiEMjNZ_fxETeNKqILAcelLeA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:51:02 -0000

STARK, BARBARA H wrote:

> All over the
> world, women and societies are brainwashed by people in control of
> broadcast and print media that having dark skin is unattractive. I’ve
> seen reports about this from India, Ghana, South Africa, Japan,
> Korea, the United States, and elsewhere.

In Japan, whiter women has been considered better for these
1,000 years, even when there was no broadcast, not even
printing.

Be careful not to be fooled by deceptive reports.

						Masataka Ohta