Re: Nomcon photographs
Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Wed, 24 October 2018 20:47 UTC
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3CB5128B14 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:47:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.879
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jksDVRnHEfe7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:47:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FDA6128D68 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:47:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.18.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w9OKllLU070644 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Oct 2018 15:47:48 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.18.66] claimed to be unescapeable.local
Subject: Re: Nomcon photographs
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <CAMm+LwhzVP3w9VEDmd3P7E4JijByhwgPFWEF-ZO7c9EwgVTXQw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <5a78fa12-5604-0b5b-4128-d63bf39ac489@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 15:47:47 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwhzVP3w9VEDmd3P7E4JijByhwgPFWEF-ZO7c9EwgVTXQw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------2BBE520FEFBED38E5DADF728"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/hVr5BZCz3IpBfAOh5EA0wPPjQyk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 20:47:54 -0000
On 10/24/18 12:55 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > I was just filling out some nomcom comments and noticed that some of > the candidates have thumbnail photographs next to their names and > others don't. > > The photographs are really useful because there are a lot of people > that I know from mailing list discussions and hallway discussions but > don't necessarily connect both sets of interactions. > > I also looked to see if there was a way to upload a photograph to my > own profile which I don't see which suggests that these photos are > being pulled from some resource that some folk can edit and others can't. Right now, anyone can send a photo to the secretariat be added to their profile. For the last several years, only the secretariat could add or remove photos. We have a work item in queue to make managing photos a self-service task. > > It would make for a fairer playing field if everyone had photos or at > least the chance to upload them.
- Nomcon photographs Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Nomcon photographs Robert Sparks