Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-11
Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 17 March 2016 08:30 UTC
Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86D1C12D7A8; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 01:30:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fJ5zPnkFaLDq; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 01:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F72012D693; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 01:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4242CCBF; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:30:26 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jqvC-UosQKmb; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:30:26 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 891C62CC9A; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:30:23 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Subject: Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-11
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_41E3CE0C-F78B-49EE-9129-4EAB410A4EAB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <0cf001d173e4$4c8d2030$e5a76090$@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 08:06:02 +0000
Message-Id: <02BF4590-2C46-4D4F-8D9C-22C6F960754E@piuha.net>
References: <00b001d162a0$800314b0$80093e10$@gmail.com> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D2432779493623E85A06@MX104CL02.corp.emc.com> <0cf001d173e4$4c8d2030$e5a76090$@gmail.com>
To: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>, "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/h_WLU7e1hlozkVJj93YveICTXE0>
Cc: draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker.all@tools.ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, IETF Disgust List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 08:30:31 -0000
> WRT section 6.3.2 (now section 5.3.2) “persistently fails to deliver acceptable TDM service” is discussed in significant detail in Appendix A of the referenced [ID-ietf-pals-congcons] - it turns out to be a much longer discussion by comparison to section 6.3.1 (now section 5.3.1) that involves references to ITU-T G.826 and G.875. I’d prefer not to reproduce or try to summarize that discussion in the tsvwg-circuit-breaker draft, but a sentence could be added to the end of that section to point the reader in the right direction, e.g.: “See Appendix A of [ID-ietf-pals-congcons] for further discussion.” Sounds reasonable to me as well. Thanks for the review & fix! Jari