Re: Review of draft-ietf-kitten-krb-auth-indicator-04

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 01 February 2017 21:42 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04D8B129A64; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:42:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lGCh0irRjyjK; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:42:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03DD11295DC; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:42:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56AC32D299; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 23:42:33 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FmnQlkihM_DQ; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 23:42:32 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5642CC9B; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 23:42:32 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Subject: Re: Review of draft-ietf-kitten-krb-auth-indicator-04
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5DD3C1ED-684C-4A16-8944-49B1D744E684"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <20161225182404.GN8460@kduck.kaduk.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 22:42:32 +0100
Message-Id: <98EA1299-05B2-4AE2-A3AE-B88544CA4AE5@piuha.net>
References: <148243567232.26011.10783984451734200377.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20161225182404.GN8460@kduck.kaduk.org>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@MIT.EDU>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/haMHBHJyqPvicfqiE8_ZDAkm7zg>
Cc: kitten@ietf.org, gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-kitten-krb-auth-indicator.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 21:42:48 -0000

Many thanks for the review, Robert. These reviews are much appreciated,
and at least from my perspective, improve the quality of the RFCs. Happy
to hear from Benjamin that he’s considering the editorial issues Robert
found in this case.

Jari