IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Tue, 10 September 2013 06:43 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A67011E8194 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 23:43:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f5gqiIUPy+0W for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 23:43:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x229.google.com (mail-ie0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F6611E8188 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 23:43:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id tp5so15170956ieb.14 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 23:43:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=XjsrMpl2UQTFMn033At9XPVHcGxnxfalNsIYzUl2k8g=; b=gLeXDX1s8WJ09GDSGQGIpXm9GpB9Uu583MYyb8w4cg5TX2vL6VzZqO/tk0i0bIi768 Yz1VyLHjNCDTLgCxyhwv5bRuSc0Dnod9CQ7BeOQf/E8DvSrFlzSXkhW+qXVNR924/JFp LddPbBibup+ApQEVpDR2BSjuTRHXLtDvgVkw3gxTQR2lmP0ODJaTEnoWqv9ptumVvvSm OirLN9O5j5bU6gQYgG6VJt+2thcKN0diRLdaMmgEHyE4P/r7UHm/CXRok4L5wB6pCa5+ 7RJA9F4ZTPMESPrGAIZ57rnGMhLTC0oyexlVhrOBYuUZw1Blz0S9I9Pu2muOtPxzBe8o u91Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=XjsrMpl2UQTFMn033At9XPVHcGxnxfalNsIYzUl2k8g=; b=gX6quyijhkYed+CKuyfTSgYxNP3qIb44+AlongHL3HOKMT+Wxk0VjRNILBS3EKX+TQ 9n/bHd4qVo4s6hCXNVU5izvSyAVLHzxlQyGHdBrNSyvNDzmg6lJPBaXqv9MpO3jywG2M 9aBNSMzrUuXb+zfkNjouKLK4R0pXYSJ5+BkS15k7TNhgf30xW6PCAHVb6qXEMyzgCM/q 8XWnyUhl4D/7ipFmobM8iAJlUG1gxWtwule0uT4AzOAkRkc05b6Vg8zf7xD5l044LAKB GpPbvagy5RV5u9qltS4FgG8d1YZ933iLp+YNJlihYPf9kJasz6u3eHt3n069MHhi/eLO bqmg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmCBUhR7VdXgUyxBLL6F+W95ak1ZrKuqVFL9EcPH97NxJAqTvp/gGMIy1V+gGYZMo5Td9PEtt5fdHnES3sqx1cjrpUyPDwKuiFl2VRWAVmyimECqhbAiDD1Hho569APiSAWtRG0d0P2jPFLrYg8CRCBcmjhFQ9hFJKCa+IZdoSJl8t7WD3m+Di4f7j1Qc19AIxx6IT1
X-Received: by 10.50.73.194 with SMTP id n2mr10371522igv.6.1378795386883; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 23:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.76.138 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 23:42:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EF0EE7D30@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
References: <20130819135219.8236.40060.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKD1Yr1VpJne1h-Q5xbNMYRhpr_n0Wmn6UqfeG3vEg2MY6ms1g@mail.gmail.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EF033638D@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <CAKD1Yr0pqeO9KdcKFWVqWP_5pmZ6fgQ5h4tQ=vOO57d-dg5+DA@mail.gmail.com> <10526_1378283356_5226EF5C_10526_843_1_1B2E7539FECD9048B261B791B1B24A7C511C52CE60@PUEXCB1A.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <CAKD1Yr3SddZio-vHGHK=5smb94HP58cY05_TGgWQpkS3=Ay8_w@mail.gmail.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EF033645A@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <CAKD1Yr0CUzSDv9H1eCUpMRUjBDS2OCkfsfE+S+3J8Z-_6=uVSg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKHUCzwYrjyobah-oPWD3vwUeUH5XZ7U=Fqof-f28tneS8jAvQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0_yOaDjrH-5K696YaziZZR+EMxdRCf=JZBW5LZgWS45Q@mail.gmail.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EF06D0A6F@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <CAKD1Yr3cgJ-xumsMK3eL3zySGsPqXU9uw4L857bJ0VEGcA5mBQ@mail.gmail.com> <522EA306.9010103@bogus.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EF0EE7D30@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 15:42:46 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr2dK4oQ67qvFQBmmVNMBgTCrTqF7XXn=NxH+3gqxP+W-w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
To: "<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0122ee3240f72704e601d175"
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, BINET David IMT/OLN <david.binet@orange.com>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 06:43:11 -0000

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 3:27 PM, <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:

> Having consent form all vendors is valuable but I'm afraid this is not the
> goal of this document.
>

If not "all vendors", then what about "some vendors"? Is it a goal of this
document to have consensus from some implementors? Or is consensus from
implementors a non-goal?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email