IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100

"Thompson, Jeff" <jefft0@remap.ucla.edu> Fri, 27 May 2016 07:55 UTC

Return-Path: <jefft0@remap.ucla.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F2A12D1E1; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.626
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.626 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GlTgMcHZ4KyQ; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:55:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EMHUB6.ad.ucla.edu (emhub6.ad.ucla.edu [169.232.42.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA79612D178; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EM1A.ad.ucla.edu ([192.168.4.111]) by EMHUB6.ad.ucla.edu ([169.232.42.123]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:55:14 -0700
From: "Thompson, Jeff" <jefft0@remap.ucla.edu>
To: Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>
Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Thread-Topic: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Thread-Index: AQHRttIxDqCPR9krlk+qGW2E2m1YfZ/L21YA//+0O+qAANCsAIAAQ0GA///JDYA=
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 07:55:12 +0000
Message-ID: <D36D49EE.35116%jefft0@remap.ucla.edu>
References: <20160525220818.18333.71186.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <700D9CB7-4EFD-459B-AA12-133A6BB04E90@senki.org> <1C8639E6-1058-4D04-84ED-0C354E6567D1@cisco.com> <9CBABA69-1814-4676-9C69-E129F04AD24C@cisco.com> <5DFDEA43-8156-491D-A300-2BCED1AED1A4@gmail.com> <5747909C.20403@si6networks.com> <955df2106aa2e12cefbd450be022e779.squirrel@www.trepanning.net>
In-Reply-To: <955df2106aa2e12cefbd450be022e779.squirrel@www.trepanning.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.4.160422
x-originating-ip: [80.35.251.60]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <BBDE59E2F5E3C640841890D2AC3B5A77@em.ucla.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/hdGpzBGg6RUVLF86m8QLVmwbrmM>
Cc: "recentattendees@ietf.org" <recentattendees@ietf.org>, "Ietf@Ietf. Org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 07:55:16 -0000

On 2016/5/26, 21:11:51, "Recentattendees on behalf of Dan Harkins"
<recentattendees-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of dharkins@lounge.org> wrote:

>  I would also like to suggest that the ability of certain members
>to bring their family on a vacation that coincides with an IETF
>should not be a governing factor in venue selection. Many people
>like to launder a business trip into a family vacation (myself
>included!) but that's not why the IETF exists and it should have
>no bearing on where we meet.

So then, the IETF policy would read ³The IETF may hold meetings in
countries where the law declares some people less valid. If you are such a
person, then the IETF recommends that to avoid trouble with the law you
should hide who you are, including not bringing your family.²

Is this the organization that the IETF is going to be?

- Jeff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email