Re: ietf.org unaccessible for Tor users

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Wed, 16 March 2016 11:44 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A0912D557 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 04:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oaImzhaPdkjZ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 04:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B12712D54E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 04:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1ag9sb-0002jN-Uv; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:44:46 +0000
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 20:44:44 +0900
Message-ID: <m2pouuodeb.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Subject: Re: ietf.org unaccessible for Tor users
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_i+yFhJVYvcMLSEgkOkqJjZBsQicCQsi13SaoVQuzxqc8g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <56E90BF9.4090306@cisco.com> <871189680.1322359.1458113811142.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <CAHw9_i+yFhJVYvcMLSEgkOkqJjZBsQicCQsi13SaoVQuzxqc8g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/hdKn0Q1nLz0KMuB7BJU0OfwGqe4>
Cc: IETF Disgust List <ietf@ietf.org>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:44:54 -0000

> I haven't seen anything discussing this - while the current round of
> beard pulling provides me with much entertainment, perhaps we could
> *also* discuss twiddling the knob or, more productively, see if the
> folk responsible for keeping this running know about the knob?
> Presumably it could be twiddled until / unless the *IETF* actually
> sees pain from Tor?

would be nice.  the op had a second issue. the cert masquerade opening a
mitm.

randy