Gen-ART IETF Telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-12
worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Wed, 18 May 2016 20:03 UTC
Return-Path: <worley@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C087412D697 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 May 2016 13:03:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.934
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.934 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcast.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X0mCCPYqV9Cp for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 May 2016 13:03:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-po-03v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-po-03v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe16:19:96:114:154:162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4622312D669 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 May 2016 13:03:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resomta-po-14v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.238]) by comcast with SMTP id 37gybSzZJYPZX37hCbFzxT; Wed, 18 May 2016 20:03:54 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1463601834; bh=0qH4i2Dw6ci2S2ubqqPtTGv20VGuFD7KwOjJvRm7xNY=; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date: Message-ID; b=d9WNUZVfYBxUSdkWsDrcIeFxVI+Uxdm4HuuLvUsVjvHwrH5kotIQODQmycek6OsV2 PSkqU0r6mMG/hO5HXugFkQn+em5Y0DLZBo7mNxO0B4i22yJmuhwh5PK6qEUTiL0AKP 7bQL2aXplER2GGCc/io4xzYDnBOoXKrR1BLw3HNiDTIedWAHgI2T3rs9XAyqL4dOFs 3L1PNdbLYyN0dADuUpwOJzrNBtTd4edSQYsnjhzrs9fhbwFY+xZ+dRCSQsn5LS9dcz voIkxdLk0J8iYlEXkhIDlXPLkPD8S9aDbeWjzAPGWEYs98OMIgUf0KjEL7fenbObU+ KYUF8UFEwZOtQ==
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([73.143.237.82]) by resomta-po-14v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id vw3t1s00J1nMCLR01w3ugB; Wed, 18 May 2016 20:03:54 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (hobgoblin.ariadne.com [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u4IK3rdL032627; Wed, 18 May 2016 16:03:53 -0400
Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id u4IK3qSe032623; Wed, 18 May 2016 16:03:52 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: hobgoblin.ariadne.com: worley set sender to worley@alum.mit.edu using -f
From: worley@ariadne.com
To: gen-art@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis.all@ietf.org
Subject: Gen-ART IETF Telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-12
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 16:03:52 -0400
Message-ID: <87d1ojrv4n.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/hkZf2HqtQuM36GOxeVEGdLaoGgc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 20:03:57 -0000
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-12 Reviewer: Dale R. Worley Review Date: 2016-05-12 IETF LC End Date: 2016-05-12 IESG Telechat date: 2016-05-19 Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be fixed before publication. I have a large number of editorial comments. A few of these comments address technical uncertainties, but I strongly suspect that the technical issues have long since been fixed, as this is a revision of Yang 1, and the only needed work is clarifying the text. For more information, please see the IETF last call Gen-ART review thread: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg98051.html Dale
- Gen-ART IETF Telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod… Dale R. Worley