Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise levels

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 09 February 2015 19:00 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06FA21A1B8D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:00:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0J3DGW-ag00v for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:00:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x234.google.com (mail-pa0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 851781A6FF0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:00:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id ey11so11305968pad.11 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:00:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+rq+a6okPjY36Hk09uWQ6qMtCjmPhTeRTM4GOT3YarY=; b=NGuo9LwFE2AxJbF5SrWWnzlahRRiltJJZXiL4g6JIz0oI47gBM7w4F04Rk435v75/y yFwLJjrtMzE9hVJQbCMI3OFbHdQEXuv4muqIKpQ4cvq5p4cyAY31US2zhnINMZ4ba8P4 SiW/yi33eXyYadSqf6i0Kk9o41X0lhRKlDIW7Ly+uYAynsmb0u2rUv/0hbrq1x8hderK kw1KG6gFsTc9e4ZGHJuXzR4+LwWCfvf15yGwwAaP6aQn1Wy5BIOvRtrJpKTDzPlFGMeQ haNul0R5XOHYjLLkOa/2aNJ3i6k6xyCAz25nNHr6M9w1oH7J0zdzHwzIL2tALRlZg4u4 CYww==
X-Received: by 10.68.197.10 with SMTP id iq10mr31276730pbc.143.1423508423811; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:00:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:4f88:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:4f88:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i5sm17218978pat.42.2015.02.09.11.00.21 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:00:22 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54D903C0.6050209@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 08:00:16 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise levels
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/hqnIUPR30qMv0zL3jZOCIpXYuIU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 19:00:27 -0000

Hi,

I see that the tracker has started using email aliases of the
form draft-ietf-WG-*.all@ietf.org to report on state changes,
and that these aliases now apparently include the WG as well
as the interested parties.

This is highly obnoxious. One problem is that for most recipients
the messages are pure noise (and any follow-up messages whose CC
list isn't manually pruned are additional noise). Another problem
is that they are in effect BCC'ed to the WG, so existing filters
don't catch these messages. A consequent problem of that is that
many people are likely to do what I'm about to do: figure out how
to spam filter all this noise, thereby risking to miss any such messages
that actually matter.

Please please please remove the WG lists from these aliases.
If something really needs to be brought to the WG's attention,
there are people who know they should do that.

Regards
   Brian Carpenter