Re: [IAB] IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative

Seth Johnson <seth.p.johnson@gmail.com> Fri, 05 December 2014 06:33 UTC

Return-Path: <seth.p.johnson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0708B1AC432 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 22:33:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YsE1qGEvFtok for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 22:33:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22b.google.com (mail-lb0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 782941AC434 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 22:33:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-f171.google.com with SMTP id n15so53427lbi.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 22:32:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=jPokfIUMG1SG6ydGkiC9yLOL5nhDAjj29AMkJu6HKgk=; b=Ml4qTOYYqt3vu9FR/yT5+EyOJEUwrQUE+ayyhqKr/1cCUIuh3UnF18wCSN34tT6d7W L3my03Nh+u3NtOmyCt9ybEbWzHQJZzDKy4nlfvTPwcqesrMjIQ8fPmBUnXo296RptfCm 1KMT6OBM9lSovkZW0pnDghDdnzVeHZoNaMYLHKJiRwS0Z/yxPwfEXlfxKrvdksi+0Csk YPGicmZeVZmFLHDKGZiUqyLb3ED3YeUZOy/3noxp143O+7QmCZ31BYfuHID4ZMqkjAJh m1BJb68t3lsjtNlTA1tPDmlA0cbGvRs7ztobHEKZm9hdWQ1hir7IeDnLABRwPf6iIkYV BcwQ==
X-Received: by 10.152.42.169 with SMTP id p9mr1264649lal.94.1417761169876; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 22:32:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.170.201 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 22:32:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5481467B.3060605@cisco.com>
References: <37B40FAC-C449-4A6F-9E72-0CE416F03191@iab.org> <CAMm+Lwhm5gZ5EA=K7TmRbj0W4d3znPcf92tWX66_eTZqN_44mg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwjeADoyA2envxDdj8SV0FKUFGu4dCzX81sMVpCTO=KN7Q@mail.gmail.com> <5481467B.3060605@cisco.com>
From: Seth Johnson <seth.p.johnson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 01:32:09 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJkfFBze0U_8qPz2BtfLmT-O72ZhzTYo7kQFox0E5g44g4HhDg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [IAB] IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/hsiNyrqk84d8OgTRaP7BaTXJRYc
Cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, IAB <iab@iab.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 06:33:26 -0000

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:45 AM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:
> I think one key aspect will be that the
> activity has to cover ground that the other activities not only aren't
> covering, but can't easily expand to cover.


A lesson learned.  But for all of us, the good thing is at least that
now there's a new chance to proceed properly.  NMI had to discover
this piece of hubris for itself. (Of course it's not clear yet we will
proceed in a better way.)


Seth


> Anyway, hope this helps.
>
> Eliot
>
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I am a little confused by this proposal.
>>
>> The statement of principles seems relatively unobjectionable. But
>> there seems to be rather less information on specific objectives and
>> virtually none on how those objectives would be achieved.
>>
>> There is a proposal for a council but no information on how the
>> members are to be appointed or what the source or scope of their
>> authority will be.
>>
>> There are three questions of power: How did you get it? Whose
>> interests do you serve when you use it? and How do we get rid of you?
>> I don't see answers to any of those questions in the documents
>> provided.
>
>
>