Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 20 September 2018 13:50 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DED4130DE8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 06:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cGwog_1p3rq0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 06:50:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 723FC129C6B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 06:50:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.201.11]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w8KDoRKh025314; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:50:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.217.149] (p54A6C3C7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.166.195.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42GJ5Z6VLTzDXv1; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:50:26 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <cafa1282-ae6a-93de-ea4a-d100af28d8b8@digitaldissidents.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:50:26 +0200
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 559144225.656121-3e4f2ef61238effdb8411cf9d0a767ee
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <285D6351-62DB-4350-B144-5D4C0B93A886@tzi.org>
References: <cafa1282-ae6a-93de-ea4a-d100af28d8b8@digitaldissidents.org>
To: Niels ten Oever <lists@digitaldissidents.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/huv9BEl5uNRuuBqOPtuNbfmJTXI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 13:50:36 -0000

I’ve got two stories here that may or may not be relevant.

(1) In CP360, an early IBM operating system, there was a command to terminate a virtual machine.   Originally, that was called KILL.   IBM changed that to FORCE at some kind, because KILL seemed too harsh.   I don’t think anyone was “offended” by KILL, but this is still a very American way to say this (e.g., we don’t normally “kill" things in the German language).   UNIX still uses “kill” for terminating (sending a signal to) a process, but here it helps that process names are just numbers, while in CP360 they were text names and often just were the name of the responsible person, so the command might very well have been “KILL CARSTEN”.  I’m not sure “FORCE CARSTEN” is that much better, though...

(2) When we set up our first official DNS name server here in Bremen, of course I wanted to name it “ns.<domain>”.  That was in the early 1990s, and I got lots of push back.  This was in Germany, and “NS” had been the short form of “NSDAP” 50 years ago and was thus simply not something a German would ever want to say again.  Of course there is no link between naming computer servers and names of political parties, but still this felt weird.  Again, nobody would have been “offended” by this choice of name, it just felt extremely weird to a German.  We got over that, and our name servers are now happily chugging along as “ns.<domain>” (and generally, the taboo status of certain words and abbreviations has certainly softened after another 25 years or so — we can even say “national” again without blushing).

So maybe we shouldn’t reduce the question of the proper appropriation of words from another semantic domain, to whether someone somewhere currently chooses to be offended by them or not, but maybe also think about whether we want to look like that insensitive clod to a particular community or we actually don’t have a reason to care.

(And yes, there are many, many communities that each one of us is not a part of and doesn’t even begin to understand what makes you an insensitive clod in that community.)

Grüße, Carsten