If you install Mail Filters how is the list integrity to be documented?
TSG <tglassey@earthlink.net> Wed, 11 February 2009 23:31 UTC
Return-Path: <tglassey@earthlink.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DCF43A68EC for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:31:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.019
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.280, BAYES_20=-0.74]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v4a7fRQki7af for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:31:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B1AA3A696D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:31:01 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=PWDLQ+HwLnIv0AzHTmAbFyPSShLgQzfJviw4J9vMrQMOP/3om/PbQW8xtyVs7d8h; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [67.180.133.66] (helo=[192.168.1.101]) by elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <tglassey@earthlink.net>) id 1LXOXq-0002fP-1w for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:31:06 -0500
Message-ID: <49935FBF.1020800@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:31:11 -0800
From: TSG <tglassey@earthlink.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: If you install Mail Filters how is the list integrity to be documented?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ELNK-Trace: 01b7a7e171bdf5911aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec798fae5b361e4d41fb6e6f1ff22386d4ed350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 67.180.133.66
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:31:02 -0000
There is a serious concern that when individuals are 'filtered out of IETF lists' whether by official or unofficial means, that their voices are prevented from being included into the IETF standards process. Are there any thoughts on how filters in mailing lists should be documented? Todd Glassey