IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: TSVDIR review of draft-ietf-intarea-shared-addressing-issues-02

Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Thu, 03 February 2011 01:21 UTC

Return-Path: <fernando.gont.netbook.win@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAC593A6767; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:21:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.077, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cniDiljh4ulH; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:21:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com (mail-yx0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB4F23A6407; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:21:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by yxt33 with SMTP id 33so302152yxt.31 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:25:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4qXSYKTyiE0pwXmWVYivjj+oYFCmgeUQxum+3onWF14=; b=R7/0Kas92B5vItx7hnBKCX8+Ktj/MJ5v8VgHupOcpzYaVXSHcPlboKESBuaUuT11dk urclY6cJ6ug3A/GxxHEHZceFxMIjGyS54TR/rOrPaz4+tBt33QqZMVPvrbGLJTbXdbP4 HhlwvX8Zp/ZVDXdk2iMBpWY8JSkZ/FiLd91Wc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=rEqwqPJkTIoDNY7ukiA7qZs+7FYn4xpln8bthl+urvd9zD8obOI/pJfAW+JDGK/N3F D/ZlCA4S8hVN6o/3zkJ0Ax+rXl2ARFuiqemuixm1rpgTdXFlXDCXbcZstG3DTuN9uAef FTdHRti7XzCLVO023WoKlSJOfTD9NFvT1MMfc=
Received: by 10.150.199.16 with SMTP id w16mr328837ybf.136.1296696302209; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:25:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.123] (61-128-17-190.fibertel.com.ar [190.17.128.61]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p32sm57ybk.20.2011.02.02.17.24.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:25:01 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Fernando Gont <fernando.gont.netbook.win@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4D4A03CE.9020105@gont.com.ar>
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 22:24:30 -0300
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Subject: Re: TSVDIR review of draft-ietf-intarea-shared-addressing-issues-02
References: <4D48B4EA.20503@isi.edu> <4D490FED.6060303@gont.com.ar> <4D4996AE.8060302@isi.edu> <4D49FF33.7030107@gont.com.ar> <4D4A0017.6050401@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4D4A0017.6050401@isi.edu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: id=D076FFF1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "tsv-ads@tools.ietf.org" <tsv-ads@tools.ietf.org>, draft-ietf-intarea-shared-addressing-issues@tools.ietf.org, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, TSV Dir <tsv-dir@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 01:21:43 -0000

On 02/02/2011 10:08 p.m., Joe Touch wrote:

> On 2/2/2011 5:04 PM, Fernando Gont wrote:
> ...
>>> At the least, it's worth noting that geolocation is already broken by
>>> tunnels, and that IP addressing does not ensure geographic proximity
>>> before attributing breakage on NATs or other sharing.
>>
>> Tunnels need not break geo-location. -- They do not masquerade the
>> source address. Or am I missing something?
> 
> When I tunnel using an ISI address, whomever sees my address thinks I'm
> in California.
[..]

Ok.. I see. I was thinking about tunnels in the infrastructure. -- those
are transparent in this respect.

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status