Re: The Next Generation

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Wed, 04 September 2019 06:29 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A48801200C3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 23:29:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kkmuG9Su1SjV for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 23:29:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 26C3D1200B8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 23:29:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 22404 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2019 06:17:20 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 4 Sep 2019 06:17:20 -0000
Subject: Re: The Next Generation
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <CAChr6Sz3j0iLGsB2bGvfitPzCkiTCJYHfmUF5S-8zPYMt1r+3A@mail.gmail.com> <42b4f18f-f323-98ad-1e06-9278142d728e@gmail.com> <3ca9da3f-373d-b595-9c3e-1670b23ea6ee@network-heretics.com>
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Message-ID: <85145087-85ad-5f00-5822-da750997e59c@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 15:29:40 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3ca9da3f-373d-b595-9c3e-1670b23ea6ee@network-heretics.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/hypOTUZexQY03FDmPTg2rnNKMXg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 06:29:50 -0000

Keith Moore wrote:

> I'm curious.   Are y'all also looking at experienced people whom IETF
> has driven away, and why that happens?

I attended an IEEE802 wireless interim meeting to find several
senior people once active in IETF.

Though I don't know why they leave, I felt major difference
is people there understand, partly because of narrow scope on
L2/L1 only, all the relevant technologies well. Though they
decide by vote, their decisions tends to rely not on political
debates and compromises but on technical discussions often
supported by performance comparison measured by simulations
and experiments.

That is, people there are real professionals.

						Masataka Ohta