Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08

Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk> Thu, 30 March 2017 21:59 UTC

Return-Path: <tim.chown@jisc.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE050129567 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.321
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.321 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=jisc.ac.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ocjW2gMm3LN4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:59:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eu-smtp-delivery-189.mimecast.com (eu-smtp-delivery-189.mimecast.com [146.101.78.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F019612957A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:59:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jisc.ac.uk; s=mimecast20170213; t=1490911164; bh=2zqT1BEFXVLlP+FR3MG/S9d1oxjI/0Pm3trq6WYZ+q0=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Content-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=BeGnVdMRigdSd5CC/pSqzmN58p27u3oERCz/zE64qGfREA1UXxQbOfhJ7Q2j1RLUiSjXchuWteNGIYiJJiBRy1t65b9ARFnZy6WpzE6XfMhXwR9AbGwRAmIjrLgSnCYBWUgjybyUpHo+AVoT1qRWiFKZwdkU+/28fRJG+MJfGMc=
Received: from EUR02-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-he1eur02lp0177.outbound.protection.outlook.com [213.199.180.177]) (Using TLS) by eu-smtp-1.mimecast.com with ESMTP id uk-mta-97-m-SicZteMcqoQXph4Ge7Zw-1; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 22:59:19 +0100
Received: from AM3PR07MB1140.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.163.188.14) by AM3PR07MB1138.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.163.188.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1005.2; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 21:59:18 +0000
Received: from AM3PR07MB1140.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::29d9:4eb6:edcf:55dc]) by AM3PR07MB1140.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::29d9:4eb6:edcf:55dc%14]) with mapi id 15.01.1019.009; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 21:59:18 +0000
From: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
CC: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, =?utf-8?B?T2xlIFRyw7hhbg==?= <otroan@employees.org>, "Leddy, John" <John_Leddy@comcast.com>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis.all@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
Thread-Topic: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
Thread-Index: AQHSnTZv71giYAPcbUKK9ywM4gSjvqGssVmAgAC6+QCAAAergIAAIVqAgAAFggCAAASRAIAAEj+AgABB54CAAAHpgIAAAteAgAACGICAAAp2gIAAAnWA
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 21:59:18 +0000
Message-ID: <C0210CE1-7030-4BB9-BE4F-CB693D0DB1C4@jisc.ac.uk>
References: <599257D7-532D-4512-929B-D124623EAF35@ericsson.com> <6B662F87-B0E6-4613-B406-8A22CA95DFA5@cisco.com> <4917F161-2EC8-43E0-AF4C-BFAEE44A492C@cable.comcast.com> <198e3116-5448-2fdf-4da7-4811a0133f05@gmail.com> <50E4A84C-F0ED-45ED-AA89-5713CBD8F9E0@gmail.com> <5aebc8ed-f873-94e9-1ae4-dab7b3a8ebef@gmail.com> <CA+b+ERk8kHWyBY3GPp21-pgrL_SsShaLkrn4UdecFeQPYamSEg@mail.gmail.com> <A0F19A98-7DBE-4616-B949-529ED2A81D62@ericsson.com> <CA+b+ERk_cKGB6a0SQd560cMiOzT4KbSic6fCCwQWrhNkNEcO3Q@mail.gmail.com> <76ABEAE0-6A89-4C69-82ED-968F949A3B19@employees.org> <CA+b+ERmqpRuw0z4ZQkhNYfEqGvqEJKYwM0hkuWg8dZrYXT4DdQ@mail.gmail.com> <FCFFDDCF-7A53-41E2-B414-53E568C92B35@employees.org> <CA+b+ERmELF1p_5vX_nqhB58Bm8c34N6=kkijuCRYkfkQcfKneQ@mail.gmail.com> <0ae6ba21-0529-e9ca-ab74-b18a85acad4a@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <0ae6ba21-0529-e9ca-ab74-b18a85acad4a@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [31.133.149.62]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; AM3PR07MB1138; 7:n6Vj6a+otlRpgM+wKyryPNDwgOR7R8RKco0s2OoPv0XtUbm0ly6g+U4wBlG1m9lgGJm0CaRokyFMiOkhae3kT8TMcIbIgKFikgEHxVWSiEjwY/nMsKUXZQvtGLv8zKpD1zAEinKPbmhRTHglY6HBUY46ADw0PZD+j4fnNsudMWZxW4LmRxDca3q/ciH3P8yBggdM7GOhYA3ZPO7dbBgPVzgy4xlwtF0QO8vGoVUVmikH0UG9e0RuAXk9Iqq3caMqwRBoOTZHfAlgoKQGylE5zKWRrIbQKKqlIIGsyqoZx5MwJgudP1SNVXG6S/2HqDaV1RN5tDIL0sR4G3ctPu46Vg==; 20:9yCO++Gi85BLIyFzNYoFtpcslabzo5ZNQGgQVaPXH2GXrYqyNA6BTXqHw7ZFfuOvgT3GmpTGZbrxtQZHVaipLlYezzUjUZKDiHCeHlnR//zDDvFSiBlpVYQmKIhdoDNNdCzZWh3pLc3R7GisIaSeDvo0jgR3NWCxYvZHu7W/Tmw=
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 6b4551e3-71eb-4050-9ff1-08d477b80387
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254075)(201703131423075)(201703031133081)(201702281549075); SRVR:AM3PR07MB1138;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM3PR07MB11384E2F6622D4A81855EA5BD6340@AM3PR07MB1138.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(93006075)(93001075)(6041248)(201703131423075)(201702281529075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(20161123560025)(20161123564025)(20161123555025)(20161123562025)(6072148); SRVR:AM3PR07MB1138; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:AM3PR07MB1138;
x-forefront-prvs: 02622CEF0A
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(39410400002)(39450400003)(39850400002)(39400400002)(39840400002)(24454002)(54906002)(7736002)(57306001)(81166006)(83716003)(189998001)(42882006)(99286003)(6916009)(2950100002)(8936002)(110136004)(38730400002)(305945005)(3660700001)(4326008)(25786009)(2906002)(36756003)(6436002)(53546009)(6306002)(66066001)(2900100001)(82746002)(74482002)(3280700002)(229853002)(33656002)(39060400002)(6116002)(3846002)(6512007)(50226002)(5660300001)(102836003)(6486002)(86362001)(8676002)(6246003)(53936002)(230783001)(5250100002)(76176999)(93886004)(6506006)(50986999); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:AM3PR07MB1138; H:AM3PR07MB1140.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:ovrnspm; PTR:InfoNoRecords; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-ID: <B41C0A78AD3F7F48A3CA4107C7846B02@eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: jisc.ac.uk
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 30 Mar 2017 21:59:18.2052 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 48f9394d-8a14-4d27-82a6-f35f12361205
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM3PR07MB1138
X-MC-Unique: m-SicZteMcqoQXph4Ge7Zw-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/i2OySPVVp3bsJy1JX9BKHOIUxLI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 21:59:30 -0000

> On 30 Mar 2017, at 22:50, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 31/03/2017 10:13, Robert Raszuk wrote:
>> What's wrong or what is missing in
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-05
>> 
>> ?
> 
> Once we get 2460bis out of the door, we should seriously tackle that question.
> Honestly it's going to be easier then. I perhaps disagree with Ole whether we
> need an Updates: 2460bis but that depends on the details.

Agreed (on both points). And I think you’ll find many who want 2460bis to ship as proposed by our AD will also be very willing to help work through the issues. 

Tim

>    Brian
> 
>> 
>> On Mar 30, 2017 16:05, <otroan@employees.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> Robert,
>>> 
>>>> Correct me if I am missing someting but the entire debate is not about
>>> describing or not header insertion.
>>>> 
>>>> I am under assumption that originating hosts still can legally insert it.
>>>> 
>>>> It is all about to modify EH in flight - right ? Moreover concerns
>>> raised are about side effects of it like MTU .. not lack of instructions on
>>> how to insert, modify or remove EH elements.
>>>> 
>>>> So what exactly are you expecting WG to deliver as next step if 2460bis
>>> goes fwd ? Is detecting the max MTU on end to end path even in 6man's
>>> charter ?
>>> 
>>> You can write a new protocol specification independently of 2460bis that
>>> does whatever it has to do, and then we can argue over that document on its
>>> own merits.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Ole
>>> 
>> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>