Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for last-call discussions

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Sat, 14 September 2019 17:53 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAD4E1200D5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 10:53:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.923
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.923 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.026, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id skvM2sq35axW for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 10:53:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-f47.google.com (mail-io1-f47.google.com [209.85.166.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E33D12001E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 10:53:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-f47.google.com with SMTP id a1so11572477ioc.6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 10:53:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Q8OAI0prPFUmux9l7uYh5bRxY2ORW50Jfr9u0XdOqeU=; b=dm7YraLyaQ1uPMknk3x9UkK+TbpMrArkNzL0d6M0tP7lUlr+dozOOTPPhopPCq60H7 5T8KVivM4+yVpQt2LeqUOSIcV3opnvHmIuAvVxgmmhBeBRTbk0FVsUTq2HWqJpkaUpYD ePA2kK4SLkrc1hZEgQ7K52wvKimV45GS7W6vz/FCns/UFixDk7LJijCZN5c2LAJReAqg 1ckeV9pfMbyHQ4StEYihzC+cCGycEH8RIuLXem5+pYY+K7OFkQ+1yKJeICIYcd9/OgjF /YIApgwIWo/SKJX6oohFPMzll2g9Bc0lUKlXmNxMKiMibIdM7bWYILHkZwfCP+64evSY OVIg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWeYSRQVYPXzcFGaQxKLMe+J3yNUo2Ubr1uSD2X15CJNtCHtuB0 acOVWLBMCuzgDzHQal+DwgSfF7UCSOtmJ03C8Gw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyhMMNtkv7fxOD4DJveKnAvRPD9klNDWUBtT+b0T4xCgyD9ZPkWz8AnUBqQD7f4hiD5ynYCwwl8XGBJJLldhdE=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:7709:: with SMTP id n9mr7175538iom.187.1568483630357; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 10:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20190913131837.0bfc7720@elandsys.com> <91194B51-317E-42C8-8C79-4FD48768B09A@episteme.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20190914100129.0cc39fe0@elandnews.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20190914100129.0cc39fe0@elandnews.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 13:53:39 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJJQCFeywNP53CnSUzci-LqNh7_Hp2WXATLCvzeSaX2iqw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for last-call discussions
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Cc: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/i2vBT_42OkAL9t8vTDVMkIjZIko>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 17:53:53 -0000

SM, the messages you point to are entirely unrelated to IETF Last
Call, and will not be affected by this experiment: they will remain on
this list, ietf@ietf.org.

Barry

On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 1:41 PM S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>; wrote:
>
> Hi Pete,
> At 09:55 AM 14-09-2019, Pete Resnick wrote:
> >SM, I think you misunderstood the point of the new list. It's not
> >for Last Call announcements; it's for Last Call discussion (i.e.,
> >individual Last Call comments, area review team reviews, and all of
> >their respective replies). Those messages number 50 to 100 per
> >month. Moving those messages to a separate list is the experiment.
>
> Sorry for not being clear.  The comment about announcements was about
> the ones which are usually sent to ietf@, e.g.
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/f7jzS-V6D4xIgXsGFELx1zx0Kn4
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/7q7vwduyP5JeLqm--YviPU-4uto
>
> For what it worth, those messages do not generate that many
> responses.  I understood [1] that the experiment was about moving
> those messages to a new mailing list.
>
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy
>
> 1. That does not mean that the clarification which you provided is not helpful.
>