Re: The flower standard
Pars Mutaf <pars.mutaf@gmail.com> Tue, 04 December 2012 10:19 UTC
Return-Path: <pars.mutaf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E221B21F8968 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 02:19:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.489
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.489 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.109, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aC8CVMBvibEA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 02:19:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A699D21F8750 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 02:19:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id l1so4706472vba.27 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 02:19:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=N23oBNg5ZluKezG8DG/TXAU82Z3qOpLLiWtZjIsg7qo=; b=j14y4ZBkbe+BAokJOzrnGR1B8ftI5Us07Ewdz+bqH8sHQkSkNamfg0RuQygENneamI w8X+X6bAxjYrwYryKyTRKbSNSba3VuKezERLxSUqcOdbeN0zaopNY+wCxmcmKYwYn6zk EpRUUW8WhOr6lfFwm1bMROfhl2wyhiatovSbgXKYr1O7giV0XOhhbJ9KgLO3iVyWBhPm d+BxBsUUY4gNS07V4tRUmuB+qkWmnK3tqSmmwr5yPPH36g13V3L+ExtDtDgUXMuk+4Z5 Tfm03iU6bRLNGwz/2fYtwec62E7qnWw/1x8stZcZj3taWhsGlXS3f3QNNiW8COXL1U93 jikA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.33.228 with SMTP id u4mr9763994vdi.4.1354616379003; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 02:19:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.59.1.3 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 02:19:38 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CACQuieY9PBbWZFyEYF8dUqFB21Mv5zEGEe8NoMbipbEXdxOgmw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACQuieY9PBbWZFyEYF8dUqFB21Mv5zEGEe8NoMbipbEXdxOgmw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 12:19:38 +0200
Message-ID: <CACQuieZFm1yWoYYvWOPd5g8MOyYzQw1WKrTmU=fNxBJ+dOo1xg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: The flower standard
From: Pars Mutaf <pars.mutaf@gmail.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf307d03c213d28e04d004341f"
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 10:19:41 -0000
For facebook users: http://www.facebook.com/FlowerStandard On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Pars Mutaf <pars.mutaf@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear all, > > FYI, I designed the following standard myself. It completes IETF RFC 3161. > > www.flower-standard.org > > Cheers, > Pars Mutaf >
- Re: The flower standard Pars Mutaf
- The flower standard Pars Mutaf
- Re: The flower standard Pars Mutaf