Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 21 October 2021 13:44 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E92D3A16A5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 06:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.452, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nQLxKbnlwEs5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 06:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BB593A169C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 06:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122333.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 19LBViWt026829; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 14:44:25 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=hMLGK48VBzdjfvjglGn5wsdvyuQHW22u8jZ/OvexZ80=; b=SmfEC3avkQ4gVwx9vMcdiVJAkOMdkSnXILN2Hh1VbsNqbipwGiXVookI3tZyXj5weuWW GEhH5Sy/Mr/SFm9XoZdq8RS+SV4XBO+FebSaqHm/O0WJJMUhBHODnyprol3FUOUh5aId VhV8H8tCGC7hEeHtS5lzWgpQ50kY8RgBHsL1AiW1pS4iBpA4ra0LMMBbf4X7UnzPCyjV 7BEMShTZvnIk6MYvvmFQpAgua3b9ZaqhgYGyil4nu6agGRqz43SQblezPs2KMhWxiOj5 dktmHLFmVDA6bzwOCpfegP6dON/4C6CfGiug1B82uEV56bKTDiqn7sZrsgpYO0A6kwLI 7w==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint5 (prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com [184.51.33.60] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bu0uguc3n-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 21 Oct 2021 14:44:25 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 19LDaEBF004719; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 06:44:24 -0700
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.31]) by prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com with ESMTP id 3bt3bu3c4p-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 21 Oct 2021 06:44:24 -0700
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 09:44:24 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.023; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 09:44:23 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
Thread-Topic: I-D Action: draft-rsalz-termlimits-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHXxelhF3Lq8ISqMkKyvU2xKhPZ0KvcXZyAgACGAoCAADnHgIAAmzKA//+/FoA=
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:44:22 +0000
Message-ID: <3AEC0F5B-7E25-4D4A-A600-58B511750687@akamai.com>
References: <20211021005426.639E92B1D176@ary.qy> <e6d59712-ca73-0723-5cb2-b1f749e37577@network-heretics.com> <353f301c-d3e5-7a00-3e1c-87a866c1c80b@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <353f301c-d3e5-7a00-3e1c-87a866c1c80b@joelhalpern.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.54.21101001
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <0F2FDB792BF76A499A09F70EC0E86081@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.425, 18.0.790 definitions=2021-10-21_04:2021-10-21, 2021-10-21 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=599 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2109230001 definitions=main-2110210072
X-Proofpoint-GUID: LGlgIKBxkFmb7u9r_m4nrsV-nVn7T_WE
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: LGlgIKBxkFmb7u9r_m4nrsV-nVn7T_WE
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.182.1,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.0.607.475 definitions=2021-10-21_04,2021-10-21_02,2020-04-07_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=567 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2109230001 definitions=main-2110210072
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/i8l_xrX6SIN9Lv1KVQSaJs3z4Sw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:44:35 -0000

    >> It sure seems like "we don't believe nomcoms will pick the right 
    >> people so we are inventing more rules."

No.

My intent was to encourage *the overall IETF community* that it is worth trying to get into IETF leadership more often.  NomCom can't appoint someone who isn't nominated. I am trying to get a bigger pool of nominees. In my opinion, one of the most tractable ways of doing this is to break the "once a leader always a leader" view that, in my experience, discourages new people from trying.