Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard

Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> Wed, 25 February 2015 16:23 UTC

Return-Path: <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E34101A8891 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 08:23:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TewmzpAdw7ay for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 08:23:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sabertooth01.qualcomm.com (sabertooth01.qualcomm.com [65.197.215.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B7671A90C6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 08:22:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1424881366; x=1456417366; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dtQgoC4F/yBliAOXFESOkIYxYB1vi3Jfbjp0K90qBG0=; b=XdGk4f9qkitb8zbyR9vU3j8gY2RlzHKrrIrk3741JtTZkavaclY27jLu N+NKaZAMdX5oaqof4TjYljl9eD5bEpq3Pqng/GRIJUizWeldKUTPF58VD xmkyV4ekMHhMxHLsZGzyyf8h80DvKOk1lkilLrocYo7Wg+Cj4zAmXj6Ex k=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5600,1067,7722"; a="83820035"
Received: from ironmsg01-lv.qualcomm.com ([10.47.202.180]) by sabertooth01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 25 Feb 2015 08:22:45 -0800
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,645,1418112000"; d="scan'208";a="32464143"
Received: from nasanexm01f.na.qualcomm.com ([10.85.0.32]) by ironmsg01-lv.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 25 Feb 2015 08:22:45 -0800
Received: from resnick2.qualcomm.com (10.80.80.8) by NASANEXM01F.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.995.29; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 08:22:44 -0800
Message-ID: <54EDF6CE.8070109@qti.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:22:38 -0600
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard
References: <20150127223859.28024.43756.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4257D8A3-0EFE-40E3-B0AD-8E23772B7693@mnot.net> <6F9BB11D-C224-4D7B-A06C-41EACBAAB4B2@netnod.se> <54C9DA42.5040901@cisco.com> <9EB44D8A-278B-42FC-A542-1C182AD43128@netnod.se> <A74A30F4D1214630918FD4CA@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <20150223153757.GI1260@mournblade.imrryr.org> <20150223155241.GJ1260@mournblade.imrryr.org> <tsl8ufoh9ko.fsf@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <tsl8ufoh9ko.fsf@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.80.80.8]
X-ClientProxiedBy: NASANEXM01E.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.31) To NASANEXM01F.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.32)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/iBpFlEMhll-9KArHiAWMTp0lPMc>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:23:08 -0000

On 2/23/15 10:33 AM, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I think the security implications of this draft, and by implication the
> advisability of this draft have been inadequately considered.  I believe
> a last-call is premature at this time.
>    

I presume you meant "approval is premature at this time". Obviously the 
discussion of this document prior to Last Call did not surface the 
issues that are now being discussed, so Last Call seems like exactly 
what was required.

I don't think the discussion here has completely come to ground. I am 
reading it with great interest. I'll decide what to do once the 
discussion has completed. Yes, Last Call officially completed yesterday, 
but the loop wasn't closed on some of the earlier comments, so I'm not 
about to stop the discussions that are now happening.

Thanks to everyone for their input.

pr

-- 
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478