Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities

Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> Mon, 10 April 2017 18:05 UTC

Return-Path: <rsk@gsp.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD4911294E7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 11:05:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fMbqcMaASG6H for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 11:05:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from taos.firemountain.net (taos.firemountain.net [207.114.3.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E88211296B0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 11:05:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gsp.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by taos.firemountain.net (8.15.1/8.14.9) with SMTP id v3AI5uPG017352 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 14:05:56 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 14:05:55 -0400
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
To: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities
Message-ID: <20170410180555.GA20454@gsp.org>
References: <9fee9874-1306-07a2-a84a-4e09381a5336@cisco.com> <E67FDB14-9895-48E0-A334-167172D322DB@nohats.ca> <20170403152624.GA11714@gsp.org> <93404c29-78ba-ff9b-9170-f5f2a5389a31@gmail.com> <E068F01A-B720-4E7A-A60F-AA5BDA22D535@consulintel.es> <20170404181505.GA4004@localhost> <CAAQiQRcvu-BfBA_NEqZwXsHEn6ujpa2=w7P5Vu2f6GLXjKqkcA@mail.gmail.com> <20170404202446.GB4004@localhost> <20170404211526.GA25253@gsp.org> <003F08E0-D80E-40F7-AB15-6588B7B140CF@tzi.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <003F08E0-D80E-40F7-AB15-6588B7B140CF@tzi.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/iCGcYHYcOE2rvV7ePhf_nA5cdM4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 18:06:00 -0000

On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 12:37:34PM +0200, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On Apr 4, 2017, at 23:15, Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> wrote:
> > 
> > the Wall
> > Street Journal is reporting today that a new set of procedures under
> > consideration will include demanding the phone passwords from *all*
> > foreigners entering the US.
> 
> https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-administration-considers-far-reaching-steps-for-extreme-vetting-1491303602?mod=e2tw
> 
> Whoa.  *Not stable*.


The Guardian is now reporting that not only will passwords be demanded, but so
will financial information and that travelers may face ideological questioning:

	UK tourists to US may get asked to hand in passwords or be denied entry
	https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/apr/09/uk-tourists-to-us-may-get-asked-to-hand-in-passwords-or-be-denied-entry

Further, as the secondary headline says:

	Although mitigation options exist, lawyers warn attempts to
	protect personal data may be seen as "probable cause" for searching

---rsk