Re: SDNAuth - Secure SDN authentication and authorization - Interested?

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Thu, 05 February 2015 00:17 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D8E31A00B1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 16:17:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fpYvcElOU7a5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 16:17:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com [64.89.234.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4640B1A00AD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 16:17:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19883DA0111 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 00:17:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-03.win.nominum.com [64.89.235.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D5D53E086; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 16:17:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.21.196.201] (64.110.2.19) by CAS-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (64.89.235.66) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 16:17:00 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: SDNAuth - Secure SDN authentication and authorization - Interested?
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKHUCzwHu+ziij227j-mqNwBJpfZGkh-G230QZR5GpNrqbcgFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 17:16:57 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <172EBE9E-0FEC-4FCD-A3CC-2A5AE0964345@nominum.com>
References: <012901d03692$cdc46630$694d3290$@rozanak.com> <CA+9kkMApUS=y0zNg7GDHGogU9tG=s=WwuEuy=OGdQAdCuYczOg@mail.gmail.com> <54D17283.7080708@gondrom.org> <EB9AAE7B-9756-4CB2-8CB2-CEB973306C82@nominum.com> <54D22CC4.6040305@gondrom.org> <CAKHUCzxEhaLysZKkcQnFfPB-9OZqhzbup6==8E8e6LAKJ33oFQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHbuEH7DAFtzCbTY0TZM2WJmU3QAG0EUqEYw=q223E3cceOd_w@mail.gmail.com> <CAKHUCzzCUqYDt9sztDVAJpk-abqXXgmuaSAv0yvcOC2_c9c3TQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHbuEH5mdyQggfJxRwnYnv2meaO8NwQJ-g4=ZXVLF85CjjeXtg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKHUCzwHu+ziij227j-mqNwBJpfZGkh-G230QZR5GpNrqbcgFQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Originating-IP: [64.110.2.19]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/iDoHUvCemMteROaA-YygpCGNxxM>
Cc: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, "ietf@ietf.org Discussion" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 00:17:02 -0000

On Feb 4, 2015, at 2:18 PM, Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> wrote:
> Any discussion outside of the IETF is outside the IETF, whether it's within a group, or a list, or a pub on the corner, or whatever. The IETF surely cannot impose its IPR rules to the world at large.
> 
> If the results of that discussion are later entered as a contribution to the IETF, the IETF's IPR rules apply to the person contributing, not to the originator.
> 
> If the list discussion needs to happen under the IETF rules, the list needs to be formally an IETF one.

The IETF cannot insist that Hosnieh, whose mailing list this is, do anything in particular, because it is not an IETF mailing list.   However, Hosnieh can, if she chooses, state that the list is covered by IETF Note Well rules, and can ask all participants to read and agree to the Note Well before joining the list and participating.

This is a good practice for avoiding IPR issues later on, should the work done on the list turn into IETF work.   But you are correct that there is no requirement that this be done.   Not required doesn't mean not a good idea.