IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IAOC Request for community feedback

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Tue, 23 October 2012 07:55 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0D9021F8673 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 00:55:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.671
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.671 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.048, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jo4xrEykjVlD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 00:55:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E3221F85C3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 00:55:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=beta; t=1350978935; bh=ZCskGTkj3gEGw6WSh2naOj+VBuyCqHd1ICUhemHgnG8=; l=804; h=Date:From:To:References:In-Reply-To; b=WKxiAdIFIkQZUnEdseffAiFZMa2DvgiS/i0OmFuLIvkbQ/LvcqeeZZpyLCwd9wIhA 5HbCVHSA4v0mkU9yc65qvjRO/QxjboEOgv5AJK3Ci6ejTsA+fVObBzwVsaY/60q36c dn8EUYpIypEGzMeO5Bi/+wnrl62hE4Xn0NjXBHeI=
Received: from [172.25.197.158] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.158]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLS1.0, 256bits, RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 09:55:35 +0200 id 00000000005DC033.0000000050864D77.00003D19
Message-ID: <50864D77.3070805@tana.it>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 09:55:35 +0200
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: IAOC Request for community feedback
References: <20121022234941.28301.7687.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20121022234941.28301.7687.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 07:55:38 -0000

On Tue 23/Oct/2012 01:49:41 +0200 The IAOC wrote:
> 
> We have tried to contact Marshall over this time period [...]
> 
> We think this process was not intended to be used when a sitting IAOC,
> IESG, or IAB member vacates his/her position. We believe that the
> intended use of this process was for determining whether a member
> should leave a position who is unwilling to leave and who has harmed
> the IETF. That is clearly not the case in this situation, to the
> contrary, we would have preferred Marshall to continue. It doesn't
> seem appropriate in this case, or when an member is unable to
> participate due to illness or death.

We seem to be missing a keepalive option, to be applicable to IETF
communities at large.  AFAIK, Linkedin and Facebook are not better in
this respect.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email