Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt> (Using DANE to Associate OpenPGP public keys with email addresses) to Experimental RFC
Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Tue, 09 February 2016 10:07 UTC
Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BFD01A87DB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 02:07:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5lbUiUEhGZPw for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 02:07:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 945EB1A87D2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 02:07:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3q00JG4TJnzlR for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:07:10 +0100 (CET)
X-OPENPGPKEY: Message passed unmodified
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0fiPiy9a_5IZ for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:07:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (206-248-139-105.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.139.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:07:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6FE93600B883; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 05:07:08 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 bofh.nohats.ca 6FE93600B883
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B17FB10EE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 05:07:08 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 05:07:08 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt> (Using DANE to Associate OpenPGP public keys with email addresses) to Experimental RFC
In-Reply-To: <20160208165330.16376.99994.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1602090459130.707@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <20160208165330.16376.99994.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LFD 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/iKXR_hLnKuxBKvReX3TppsUgzpk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 10:07:13 -0000
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016, The IESG wrote: > The IESG has received a request from the DNS-based Authentication of > Named Entities WG (dane) to consider the following document: > - 'Using DANE to Associate OpenPGP public keys with email addresses' > <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-07.txt> as Experimental RFC > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2016-02-22. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. As an author, I followed the directions of the WG with respect to the lowercasing or not of the LHS. Consensus on the issue was very confusing and changed multiple times, and I do believe the chairs made a wrong call at some point for calling for the removal of the LHS lowercasing. Without restarting the discussion here, I would like the IESG to take a close look at whether or not to recommend that the document be changed to do lowercasing of the LHS when possible. The implementation status section shows 3 implementations (2 written by me, the third one being gnupg) that use a lowercase call in the implementation. Paul
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey… Paul Wouters
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey… John C Klensin
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey… Warren Kumari