IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IPv10 RFC.

Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com> Wed, 16 November 2016 13:26 UTC

Return-Path: <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0FFC1295AA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 05:26:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.215
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.215 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_NONELEMENT_30_40=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hotmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kZ2IPwTJndNs for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 05:26:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SNT004-OMC1S34.hotmail.com (snt004-omc1s34.hotmail.com [65.55.90.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6D931294C3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 05:26:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EUR03-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.55.90.9]) by SNT004-OMC1S34.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 05:26:46 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=Ev4YRNQSkZ/5MkQhA8qlNvX+cVh0uohCKEOIHWIVXKM=; b=HYiPpy7g17hfHmrLEqP851DYvHDpQAN+IKggQHydgegZBIxYF3BVpdCMwIPxPF17DsZVlbYPQ3RZAiSUPDsOaBLsTthlVUr+KwiC9jZ/6t06PTGIEoE5gi6sZBLH0l8J2uBvpG9C08LnXWZ/xk38m8pe9nJKxcJR0r9Ut1ek/03FbTxJXFqwul0VHkjLfaZFFhFTDRbxVEVF7CPFXe6iSdfF2EkAe1ZnUy0qkbaGoYUFa3cSso0dgnEHj3/cL2wkWT5or4lLz76rkf+H0HPGPIkX4fx8VO2RmKccUQNzllbPuIOC9C4U7WhAkVT4Y1O+Jqjcr5RIOmCncbNLfiJ5vg==
Received: from VE1EUR03FT010.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.18.56) by VE1EUR03HT112.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.19.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.721.5; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 13:26:36 +0000
Received: from HE1PR04MB1449.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.152.18.55) by VE1EUR03FT010.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.18.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.721.5 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 13:26:36 +0000
Received: from HE1PR04MB1449.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.176.11]) by HE1PR04MB1449.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.176.11]) with mapi id 15.01.0721.015; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 13:26:35 +0000
From: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>
To: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
Subject: Re: IPv10 RFC.
Thread-Topic: IPv10 RFC.
Thread-Index: AdI//kvOhDy1Xf4HR+iC1O+obu62/w==
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 13:26:35 +0000
Message-ID: <HE1PR04MB14493634705D48CDA9405DBDBDBE0@HE1PR04MB1449.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <FBC26D35-A925-4214-B9B1-44E1AC43915D@nic.cz>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: nic.cz; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;nic.cz; dmarc=none action=none header.from=hotmail.com;
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:; UpperCasedChecksum:; SizeAsReceived:7100; Count:36
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-incomingheadercount: 36
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; VE1EUR03HT112; 7:tY6EOamk5zL1W40JZH8Qn+7veSTXmXy4evbUk6/uAJAouw5kWWeXogaBrPvDpv+aYOhsJKDrQOysb51yIpn+up73+LbPu+TtuFc+25HnV9oQ/HxJzG4f5t7EdiximcGuLg8iGOoUQRE2QgtmDW5IHNzRQzdCoNg0Lfc2K39Vj3g4wZKmBwQpwXrcY3A2u0xlh1fEAumOdht3JvHt6TEhPpElxhYGVVqSI0Fg9clem/hkcnT5r0Hl6xlwXN1ekCPWYTpQgSvOyhXXZ+3TUqRssIIgKUhL4X+oKI4E6sxxVPj4iqjjN2SwaIbv68CbH7ACkXC1T5956ZfQ8clS2BPCwM/gdKnJiPFxiFn+CfVOrew=
x-forefront-antispam-report: EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(98900003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:VE1EUR03HT112; H:HE1PR04MB1449.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 09a07a96-7193-40d2-4a2f-08d40e242f80
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(1601124038)(1603103113)(1601125047); SRVR:VE1EUR03HT112;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(432015012)(82015046); SRVR:VE1EUR03HT112; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:VE1EUR03HT112;
x-forefront-prvs: 01283822F8
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_HE1PR04MB14493634705D48CDA9405DBDBDBE0HE1PR04MB1449eurp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Nov 2016 13:26:35.7251 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VE1EUR03HT112
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Nov 2016 13:26:46.0059 (UTC) FILETIME=[13F2AFB0:01D2400D]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/iYLNvybTYA19fCO9LJaqNFHyna4>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 13:26:48 -0000

There is no reason to be in rush, things will go smoothly as long as eventually there will be a value offered.

Regards,

Khaled Omar


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: IPv10 RFC.
From: Ladislav Lhotka
To: Jay Gannon
CC: Khaled Omar ,"ietf@ietf.org Discussion "


Hi,

we have a Czech saying that goes something like this:

If somebody isn't able to accept well-intended advice, then he or she cannot be helped.

So I am wondering: isn't it time to stop responding to this thread?

Lada

> On 16 Nov 2016, at 21:28, Jay Gannon wrote:
>
> Hi Khaled
>
> Can I recommend you please read
>
> https://www.ietf.org/about/standards-process.html
>
> Regards,
>
> J
>
>
> On 16 Nov 2016 11:41 a.m., "Khaled Omar" wrote:
> Apologies if the sent text version is not having full contents.
>
>
>
> Please try this version if you have difficulty with the first one.
>
>
>

--
Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email