Re: Barely literate minutes

SM <sm@resistor.net> Wed, 28 November 2012 23:50 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 716BC21F8A4F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:50:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7DJ5uqiLXpVn for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:50:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CFAC21F899A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:50:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qASNoCv5009377; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:50:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1354146618; bh=SMQILayPg2v1V7M8syAKZta18y0e/HEPpsdEAREJfzY=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=G/0ybqIZ0ylfbhZDW8+1tndh5zED1C6VxE4LbCMyTO6mEkU6rUWgIpLYgp0SjsEXG 6q+PpMQNfKf/eOT23IfEEvReiDpeTIj/NKM6LqD09f6zBJEHaFvomSTLnnLQgw873R i0pdh/pnNKBlNu+NVe9JwLQRJxpDmxHbB/X4u0dk=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1354146618; i=@resistor.net; bh=SMQILayPg2v1V7M8syAKZta18y0e/HEPpsdEAREJfzY=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=oTAlmi6csQyeDjnE88QBkLkJr5lX7L41K1B+a4erX774rL7Tkq+3NURMqSgRWiTUX hsWOcMDIc+53rsyzoZItxcC2jzLj4ed/IsDDOM0tN3cSpYeQCdLD+5aXgXkZOSnglX Yeq6aokmJcU3eRAmJyqpHrqZvP/FsGODY8MoRsOM=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20121128150642.09f155d8@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:49:19 -0800
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: Barely literate minutes
In-Reply-To: <50B68612.7080107@dcrocker.net>
References: <CAC4RtVCogYS4tmY1LLi0C-E+B+di2_wTD0N-=AZrVR7-A8Mz+A@mail.gmail.com> <50B5C839.4060909@gmail.com> <59924CD37D50616BA8EB8EF7@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20121128023905.0afdcde0@resistor.net> <50B683C4.2030503@stpeter.im> <50B68612.7080107@dcrocker.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 23:50:25 -0000

Hi Dave,
At 13:45 28-11-2012, Dave Crocker wrote:
>Chairs have a high workload already.  A strength of a working group 
>needs to be its ability to distribute work amongst participants.

Yes.

>If a working group cannot obtain the services of a participant 
>willing to take notes and be responsible for getting wg review of 
>them, then the wg has bigger problems.

I listen to the audio as it allows me to understand the decisions and 
see whether the notes will give some random person an understanding 
of what happened.

Regards,
-sm