Re: [Gen-art] Last Call Review of draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 15 December 2016 09:08 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98FF0129C57; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 01:08:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.796
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.796 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vat2mp5n8t5T; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 01:08:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB47129C31; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 01:08:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37EB52CCAE; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:08:41 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WIA87QkCpry2; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:08:40 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DAC02CC95; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:08:40 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Last Call Review of draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B4884155-9DAA-4E6A-A943-5847CCA7582B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <a4d0aef8-45f6-002e-ab36-4af8326eea21@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:08:40 +0200
Message-Id: <96BB4C86-6F4C-4F8A-AAF3-0A910AC64A8D@piuha.net>
References: <a4d0aef8-45f6-002e-ab36-4af8326eea21@cisco.com>
To: Matt Miller <mamille2@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/iafJjdqOiy-CgM3WuUAuoXaXpN4>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-manet-dlep.all@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 09:08:46 -0000

Matt,

Many thanks for this.

Authors, did you have any responses on Matt’s comments?

Also, Matt, I had one question for you:

> 
> * The IANA registries this document establishes are not defined.
> One can deduce the required information and its format, but there
> is no guidance on review process (for example). I urge the authors
> to consult RFC 5226 when revisiting the IANA considerations.

What did you have in mind here? At least the -26 specifies Specification
Required for the registries, and given RFC 5226’s guidance on what that
means, I’m not sure what information is missing. Unless, of course, you
think that there should further expert review guidance. Or is the problem
that the allocation policy is in the table, not in the text, e.g.:

> 13.6.  DLEP Extensions Registrations
> 
> 
>   Upon approval of this document, IANA is requested to create a new
>   DLEP registry, named "Extension Type Values".
> 
>   The following table provides initial registry values and the
>   [RFC5226] defined policies that should apply to the registry:
> 
>               +--------------+----------------------------+
>               | Code         | Description/Policy         |
>               +--------------+----------------------------+
>               | 0            | Reserved                   |
>               | 1            | Credit Windowing [CREDIT]  |
>               | 2-65519      | Specification Required     |
>               | 65520-65534  | Private Use                |
>               | 65535        | Reserved                   |
>               +--------------+----------------------------+
> 
>                       Table 3: DLEP Extension types
> 
> 


Jari