Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)

[Geoff Mulligan <[e-mail]>]

So I'm confused...  We're we talking about the possibility of sticking to one European city, one north American city and one Asian city and not picking various cities throughout the world.

I was just suggesting picking -a- city in Europe that was not multiple hops from most US hubs.  Prague, while a nice city, isn't one hop and as Dave pointed out this adds costs and time, just as would choosing a US city that is multiple hops from major European hubs.

I loved Vancouver and would go back there over and over again.  I like Minneapolis for convenience and venue and would go there every time.

I liked Prague, both times, but had trouble getting there both times and it did add time and cost.

Geoff



On Aug 8, 2012, at 1:06 PM, Ole Jacobsen <[e-mail]> wrote:

> 
> Geoff,
> 
> What are you talking about? Of course we are "considering" all of 
> those places. We are going to London in 2014 for example, we went to 
> Paris this year. But, like with all popular places, finding venues 
> available for OUR dates is not easy. Add to that the costs and you 
> will understand why we don't meet in London or Paris or Frankfurt or 
> Amsterdam more often.
> 
> Ole
> 
> 
> Ole J. Jacobsen
> Editor and Publisher,  The Internet Protocol Journal
> Cisco Systems
> Tel: [phone]   Mobile: [phone]
> E-mail: [e-mail]  URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj
> Skype: organdemo
> 
> 
> On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Geoff Mulligan wrote:
> 
>> So then why not consider, London, Paris (not the Concorde 
>> Lafayette), Frankfurt, Amsterdam?
>>