comment on the proposed new note well

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Fri, 08 January 2016 14:31 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98BEB1A89FA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 06:31:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oxfWhnizd7mz for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 06:31:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D8DD1A89F6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 06:31:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA1BE20B33 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 09:31:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 08 Jan 2016 09:31:12 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=cxIZoa6SwbYr38o6CSOzre638zg=; b=WWT58 2DTh60woF8q/RtX7nObGKwCsd7GTbdRRmh9SFw4ZbJDN5jmSMsgPQCHmuyoRIh6p 26jbzE25rjCYcUcjIiYMuwn0mUVAQwPMKzdxjULl2cO7T96DzSJ0rI9u9iKhKp/G DwTKbHRLcFa4y4Pztv2w3XIEJcMX8NI/WM+Cc8=
X-Sasl-enc: YDkb2gJtt5SH8HKWDc6ZSKcxehqRoq/PuHoo3e0OqtCq 1452263472
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 830CB680194; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 09:31:12 -0500 (EST)
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Subject: comment on the proposed new note well
Message-ID: <568FC82D.2090201@network-heretics.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 09:31:09 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ilVCVXYe-sUIHVmR0cSfdPgePJE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 14:31:14 -0000

I think the note well needs to make it clear that the patent policy 
applies to _any_ discussion that might influence the decisions that an 
author or wg or iesg makes about a document - whether or not it occurs 
in a wg meeting or on a mailing list.

Also, patent infringement is not a matter of "awareness" since it's a 
gray area.   And someone should have to disclose a patent held by his 
employer even if his employer isn't "sponsoring" his IETF participation.

I would say instead something like "if you have reason to believe that a 
contribution to the IETF is covered by patents or patent applications 
that are owned by, controlled by, or would benefit, you, your employer, 
or your sponsor, you must disclose that fact, or not participate in any 
discussion regarding the contribution with anyone who could influence 
the content of the document or whether it is approved."

Keith