Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)

Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com> Wed, 02 April 2014 23:16 UTC

Return-Path: <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E901A041D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 16:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ycd2KdnY6cAV for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 16:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x231.google.com (mail-qg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 651FE1A0416 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 16:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id e89so961478qgf.22 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 16:15:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=1j8eym6U2yqaYGrzQFSotkCeAKakyHGHizbB6DprtLA=; b=lWvt+bi7n0Sydm71rugNHzXx9H64w2XpHLulEV5tWf5uDJaArIXaWWzauciVaf82Zk E9u9gXpDRl5GSQ4hQW5+EWQvNmX1lc5jXtoJTbi9sLvOO+jSgNpQI66CBizkBZe2AUe4 qxilr+kd56uH6CoWjjXFqkWm5UXHF3MgqfWMEpt5RxpeYpCEYVusZi3u5MeX15gu6U2y xnb2aNFqFedXx/U+J8f64h7IzzNOF0h62l+nR3YMRhvHoJey2jFxo5SAWk7NqUv/bTN0 WMv01MwbrCX+9Ug41DzoCt8St6KMmTR0Qt6uZkICrlueMTP0DDj8m3JcrdQ+Jp2erz0B f3+A==
X-Received: by 10.140.36.77 with SMTP id o71mr3565617qgo.25.1396480558257; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 16:15:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:6:3a80:77e:6475:9ee9:6848:262? ([2601:6:3a80:77e:6475:9ee9:6848:262]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g92sm4511553qge.7.2014.04.02.16.15.56 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Apr 2014 16:15:57 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
Subject: Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
From: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <E987419F-495E-4AA7-AD1C-26122486D9EF@nominum.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 19:15:57 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0264E354-7040-4AF2-9F90-873332F03C59@gmail.com>
References: <20140401220040.F06667FC394@rfc-editor.org> <CAA=duU2cV0XLctSBeeW8OtXnCSYDGeWJUyv_uGT25V-4N+J8EA@mail.gmail.com> <AE6C1CD9-8E98-458B-8B53-A6275892471A@gmail.com> <0FA55A15-7D95-4AD9-B2FE-19C6C80CD377@me.com> <CAMm+LwhNS-iKuzSCb0dhBypVFVzmi7HCZFvGNGExL5WtJ1jhsg@mail.gmail.com> <59C504C7-9E84-4CE8-B46D-A5E90329C0C8@gmail.com> <1396447162.15324.7725.camel@mightyatom> <E987419F-495E-4AA7-AD1C-26122486D9EF@nominum.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ilhnUgVonrwCjnNt8Mqp_AFcxm4
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 23:16:07 -0000

On Apr 2, 2014, at 10:12 AM, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> On Apr 2, 2014, at 9:59 AM, Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com> wrote:
>> .. and of course the rancid yak butter...
> 
> It's better if the yak butter isn't rancid.
> 
> Anyway, these are all good suggestions for draft-ietf-tcoff-rfc7168bis.   Is anyone interested in forming a BOF?
> 
Yeah, sounds like we have some i18n issues….until the politicians get involved, and then it's an "internet governance" problem….