Re: Forced virtual IETF 109 as well as 107

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Mon, 16 March 2020 00:41 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96743A1F02 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 17:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.696
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.696 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, LOTS_OF_MONEY=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1LGsSu1xxFAC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 17:41:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164E83A1F01 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 17:41:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.115.160.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 02G0f8HV019161 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 15 Mar 2020 17:41:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1584319280; x=1584405680; i=@elandsys.com; bh=AEXDGs4cZHnhKyB7kd7+JDccR+ugpUMVF64Af7HXte4=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=csW9ZUvWikUL4X1KxDQnKDJ7Nmv5zUnYexjKJ+wYh2CwhGUBm+gMoSFIOElGGUgrB 8Wj/c0MbILfSx+PE5m2vhwZ58Tr3K119UwLIEKrTV+IFLggyEPfZu4PS0bxHLyik7V mKvNFVKokl/IsvPTtTMTA60aiwZhJKULKxKpRrl8=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20200315161845.0bf735a8@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 17:39:09 -0700
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: Forced virtual IETF 109 as well as 107
In-Reply-To: <b73c8369-1541-b42e-3622-d1023a348fa2@gmail.com>
References: <CALaySJ+kFVXrVAkYLaO6MaPqDA29MzXhVFcxG0c6hZcBs-LqnQ@mail.gmail.com> <C9E8B3DAE355FAD80C21236C@PSB> <1UW5qAlIZh.2Vbp3oIhq6g@pc8xp> <683bb0d2-2d0d-041f-4d06-759c728025ec@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200314170427.0bd33fd0@elandnews.com> <b73c8369-1541-b42e-3622-d1023a348fa2@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ipzTTIaeEsoYeXN4JQggQdt-xv0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 00:41:29 -0000

Hi Alex,
At 02:05 PM 15-03-2020, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
>What do you mean by R0?
>
>Indeed, it might be so.  I do not know.  I am just struck by seeing 
>the map how it is.  I do not know.

My comments should not be read as medical or health advice.  There is 
some information about R0 at 
https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/70863 (Page 15 of the document).

>For the amounts of money.
>
>I understand no attendant to IETF Vancouver was not reimbursed; or 
>they are all about to get reimbursed.   (I think?)

 From what I understand, there was a full refund.  People familiar 
with budgeting might look at the matter from other angles.

>For the sources of money.  Currently several sources of money are 
>being made available to compensate to many things, such as 
>tele-work, or 'partial no-work' and many others.  There are specific 
>budgets to SMEs as well.  At a high level, China claimed injecting 
>130M dollar (milliard, i.e. billion in English); America talked 
>about 50, France about 15 or so.  Other countries too. These numbers 
>are non negligible.

The numbers which you mentioned might be non-negligible.  It is 
difficult to translate that into quick impact on daily life.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy