IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets

SM <sm@resistor.net> Wed, 25 April 2012 23:15 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3131C21F87BC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:15:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.546
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.546 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.053, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yO+13es3vrtR for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:15:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9045221F87A2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:15:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3PNFVJE007232; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:15:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1335395737; i=@resistor.net; bh=mX49jr84OrrtI5AkDexJqgkEdHVdLPAubMRwJ1f97tU=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=xBgSPvw8f5y9DCcI3MC9xT7YtzddMsb7hbLUvW06vp54F9qcBZ7W7MUWHPOmsL2Kw UQn4lB2k5FfgtIEsOTO//yvij0O2DhoFCtDIPwf1lfF/FCeMJ2Hi6ht1+htI11N0wu 50BHx4muKiwjB+yXe+/mqosas5nzlKt5flrfmLO8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1335395737; i=@resistor.net; bh=mX49jr84OrrtI5AkDexJqgkEdHVdLPAubMRwJ1f97tU=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=tPOxqXQ8dMtEwqJE7uS5xEFU6TIrKoHBPcU0m7tlxHslUmBbIG8RMXJu56/2kjiD2 8npkJcQjwF34p3h1+BFGW+0ki+dTQsJeiNQCA5GXW/ZFyfOt8WWP1JIuoNYxXs6Ggi gk9tGJtJ8BMxzWDJsPeRefaMxzAPIfTMsefgAR+g=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120425154759.0a76eb98@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:11:30 -0700
To: Eric Burger <eburger-l@standardstrack.com>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
In-Reply-To: <0A62A799-6E70-40A5-B5A9-EB522FC72C85@standardstrack.com>
References: <2AC114D8-E97B-47A0-B7E0-9EF016DCB09F@ietf.org> <DCC302FAA9FE5F4BBA4DCAD465693779173ED21640@PRVPEXVS03.corp.twcable.com> <0A62A799-6E70-40A5-B5A9-EB522FC72C85@standardstrack.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: IETF list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:15:41 -0000

Hi Eric,
At 15:06 25-04-2012, Eric Burger wrote:
>For the former purpose, just having a list is sufficient. However, 
>for the latter purpose, one needs records that would be admissible 
>in court. Without eating our dog food and having some sort of 
>audited digital signature technology, a simple scan will not do.

I assumed that the IAOC considered the legal implications of 
discarding the blue sheets before the IETF was asked for 
feedback.  The IAOC is supposed to be working on a statement of 
privacy since mid-2011.  There is a document about retention policy.

I haven't seen any of the above mentioned in this long thread.

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email