Re: multihoming, was IPv10

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 30 December 2016 03:16 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611211293FE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 19:16:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n5Cd2DnoEfyn for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 19:16:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x229.google.com (mail-pf0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C1A81294E7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 19:16:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x229.google.com with SMTP id d2so64634767pfd.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 19:16:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DDYU3kO9Mi93MDATf6AziN6VfT9d+dFUQBp8xSRiXfU=; b=PVjOmbmupZPMJJNaMmzIHN62qdK+RCtKvU4gV4zNREyDQe68JDk3NbQUyu/zhWLinz bfjtuXismK5A31NVAlB0r9G0aAZNLQUiTfT0m2/46iG7IpCa1Sbp5ZR/KflQROY2uYpU Pr9dwdyYTY8rDjCa+dyIJeyh58s71+nEfrvErkPlMnlSapuK733Mo1Svr/IdzKlDjZdD u5Goo4e/GQPYAdrdCFJb0UGK9YcIfFi5PCPkDBrdXDLhJhH7M+rOBpuKz/sKvgX2sg5k iBFnOv0O5DhjSniEqk/NeypGzoO5RIahior32q2L8/QkHzIIBRrc4r3sGjNZcuhUDjTv IsIw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DDYU3kO9Mi93MDATf6AziN6VfT9d+dFUQBp8xSRiXfU=; b=Zex9bUMGavj761vkNh5bLq7cxZyiqYwMB0FiWcSu6d8CgV3UGcJwFb9Tr5/pANC6HF 9zagvKyCN+JXZGV81aQsNeFd2Vp7DsJgWUnp2RTyplx9SKgm9qSK0Bz0byxpMbxU7V4d /g7iIDgjsR94OmOmVXXddQC899+UDzAgk2uoBXGiCkhPP7+BZUpW1k+QZyOwYotjLMRU 9vmGb0HTOny5reCdMkTCAuYPYHst809yyJnoM4gn96ddrHmSK+O36storZn0ZcVtXtER r22lpvMKODYEB/Tz4wEwT2fvwcynlMKnXnW6l+Vll5LKu+ppCtjoeUgpaQrK0CZ9GbEl OX4A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIzuNIFnV6L2GFwqSZKUWnRbvjrTDJKQKbTenZ/LQPnraUIQkpfV9ikPVEWToTPrw==
X-Received: by 10.84.191.131 with SMTP id a3mr93155098pld.62.1483067773475; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 19:16:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.27] (215.24.255.123.static.snap.net.nz. [123.255.24.215]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r88sm107886239pfe.93.2016.12.29.19.16.11 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 29 Dec 2016 19:16:12 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: multihoming, was IPv10
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <20161230024719.36002.qmail@ary.lan>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <7401a840-590e-28c3-2c3f-1e4b46c34e29@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 16:16:19 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20161230024719.36002.qmail@ary.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/iwNMN_LDs79oseGRqNt3YQbBQj4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 03:16:16 -0000

On 30/12/2016 15:47, John Levine wrote:
> In article <m2poka5e9p.wl-randy@psg.com> you write:
>>> We do have the technology to provide a CERT to every customer.  See
>>> SIDR.
>>
>> see frequent residential address reassignment
> 
> That's not really a problem, since vanishingly few resi customers are
> multihomed.  The problem occurs with customers who are big enough to
> be multihomed but not so big that they have a staff that knows all
> of the magic of BGP and expensive routers.

Which is exactly why we have to make multi-prefix multihoming work
out of the box. Which is why we have RFC 7157 and RFC 8028
and draft-ietf-rtgwg-dst-src-routing, and we're not done yet.

   Brian