Re: Last Call: Uplifting RFC5289 from informational to proposed standard
"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Fri, 17 February 2017 18:10 UTC
Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0AF212957B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 10:10:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y7fBXb3gBG4Z for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 10:10:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6379129453 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 10:10:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.32.60.120] (142-254-101-176.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.101.176]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id v1HI8p5m080910 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 11:08:53 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 142-254-101-176.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.101.176] claimed to be [10.32.60.120]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: Uplifting RFC5289 from informational to proposed standard
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 10:10:14 -0800
Message-ID: <43652E06-5DC6-4467-9BBF-6B4BBABEC6F0@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <148735040735.19992.5678820892795925914.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <148735040735.19992.5678820892795925914.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5344)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/izbJ6EcfcLuEyQnxCZTNMgi6v08>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 18:10:14 -0000
Moving these algorithms to standards track is a good idea, and long overdue. On the other hand, turning "uplifting" into a verb is a terrible idea. "Promoting" is a perfectly valid term for this action. --Paul Hoffman
- Re: Last Call: Uplifting RFC5289 from information… Paul Hoffman