IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)

"Richard Shockey" <richard@shockey.us> Tue, 07 August 2012 23:34 UTC

Return-Path: <richard@shockey.us>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A569411E8104 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 16:34:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.973
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.973 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.522, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9SWma7Eip0Hs for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 16:34:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oproxy8-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy8.bluehost.com [IPv6:2605:dc00:100:2::a8]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 03AE011E8103 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 16:34:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 20327 invoked by uid 0); 7 Aug 2012 23:34:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box462.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.62) by oproxy8.bluehost.com with SMTP; 7 Aug 2012 23:34:05 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shockey.us; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:To:From; bh=XrAv3K4Ajwmo5okqt8gGLc1HjyIkz85vLo9J5P87+FI=; b=AK2WxzvA3LVZ2+bYNVnWEYQQjmOAQfy+Wko4neATt+OcutrV6W0dmrTyiZWUG2xp70dN6UsGfNas+4aSLgwAwo/8ssy1uSHBKBxyLuRMJY2w9Z62tIsJPfhrmuj4vs7p;
Received: from [71.191.243.130] (port=55464 helo=RSHOCKEYPC) by box462.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <richard@shockey.us>) id 1SytHo-0005n5-Df; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 17:34:04 -0600
From: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
To: 'Steve Crocker' <steve@shinkuro.com>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <31BCE4DE825B3F4D9E452EFBBD3F1EF2834A0516@PACDCEXMB01.cable.comcast.com> <502169E9.9020009@dcrocker.net> <AC30AAA7-8634-4851-86CC-6F64095BB600@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|0ebd669a4eccc2cca00daf1beb84ed50o76MuX03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|AC30AAA7-8634-4851-86CC-6F64095BB600@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <39C56E09-72AD-4C99-9A62-3992DEF04D70@shinkuro.com>
In-Reply-To: <39C56E09-72AD-4C99-9A62-3992DEF04D70@shinkuro.com>
Subject: RE: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 19:34:02 -0400
Message-ID: <01af01cd74f5$217e5770$647b0650$@us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac106DQp2r0tsdIiRxCG3+4lQPsX1wAC8QhA
Content-Language: en-us
X-Identified-User: {3286:box462.bluehost.com:shockeyu:shockey.us} {sentby:smtp auth 71.191.243.130 authed with richard@shockey.us}
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 23:34:12 -0000

+1  Prague was excellent .. I actually liked Quebec City but connections
were awful.  

So where in Asia?  You have to have the 3.  

Is this discussion is really about are we the Internet Entertainment and
Travel Facility??   Some of us have employers some of us do not.  Is this
about "diversity" or getting the work done. 

-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Steve Crocker
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 6:01 PM
To: Tim Chown
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)

I'll bet Dublin would be rated higher if the meetings had been downtown.
Same for Vienna.

Steve
 
On Aug 7, 2012, at 5:55 PM, Tim Chown wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> My top three repeat venues would be Prague, Minneapolis and Vancouver.
Great meeting venues, with everything you need nearby.
> 
> My least favoured venues have been Dublin, Vienna and Maastricht.
> 
> Of course, you have to experiment to find good repeat venues...
> 
> Tim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email